Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 19 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Milestar Weatherguard AW365 vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 19 + 4,267 owner reviews. How we score
Weatherguard AW365 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 5 tests Owners 57 · 4,267 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wear)
“They have been great so far. Unfortunately, only minor snow storms since they were installed but so far so good . Very quiet and predictable handling.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Weatherguard AW365 +761Why this score
Source Weatherguard AW365 Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 68 52 Weatherguard AW365: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 68
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 52.1 = 61
No road tests of dry for Weatherguard AW365. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
74
Wet
Weatherguard AW365 +470Why this score
Source Weatherguard AW365 Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 75 60 Weatherguard AW365: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 60.4 = 70
No road tests of wet for Weatherguard AW365. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Snow
Weatherguard AW365 +267Why this score
Source Weatherguard AW365 Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 68 61 Weatherguard AW365: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 69
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 71 + 40% × 60.6 = 67
No road tests of snow for Weatherguard AW365. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
65
Comfort
Weatherguard AW365 +560Why this score
Source Weatherguard AW365 Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 63 56 Weatherguard AW365: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 62.8 = 65
Solus 4S HA32: 40% × 66.1 (est.) + 60% × 56 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Weatherguard AW365. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Solus 4S HA32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
65
Noise
Solus 4S HA32 +671Why this score
Source Weatherguard AW365 Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 62 ≈ 66 (est.) Weatherguard AW365: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 65
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 73.8 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71
No road tests of noise for Weatherguard AW365. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Solus 4S HA32. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
70
Treadwear
Weatherguard AW365 +565Why this score
Source Weatherguard AW365 Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 72 57 Weatherguard AW365: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 56.8 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Weatherguard AW365. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison52Why this score
Source Weatherguard AW365 Solus 4S HA32 Reviews found online – 52 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison54Why this score
Source Weatherguard AW365 Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Milestar Weatherguard AW365 | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 66 |
| Dry | 68 | 61 |
| Wet | 74 | 70 |
| Snow | 69 | 67 |
| Comfort | 65 | 60 |
| Noise | 65 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 52 |
| Efficiency | – | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Weatherguard AW365
66
/ 100
Solus 4S HA32
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Weatherguard AW365
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordable price point
- Strong winter and snow traction, comparable to dedicated snow tires
- Reliable handling in wet conditions and heavy rain
Cons
- Slightly louder road noise compared to standard highway or all-season tires
- Reduced stability or slightly 'squeamish' feel on dry pavement
- Struggles somewhat on hard-packed snow and ice compared to deep snow
Tire B Solus 4S HA32
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium alternatives
- Good grip and confidence-inspiring performance in wet and winter conditions
- Comfortable ride quality that effectively absorbs road imperfections and potholes
Cons
- Some users reported faster-than-expected tread wear or peeling
- Road noise can increase or become prominent in hot weather or as the tires age
- Dry cornering and high-temperature performance lack the sharpness of dedicated summer tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Milestar Weatherguard AW365
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Solus 4S HA32
The community generally views the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 as an affordable, budget-friendly all-weather tire that delivers quiet operation and predictable, surprisingly good winter handling. However, opinions are divided due to frequent reports of fast tread wear and shorter lifespan compared to tier-one alternatives. While some users find them to be great value for mild winter and year-round commuting, others recommend higher-tier brands if longevity is a primary concern.
teslamotorsclub.com
·1 upvote ·2023-02-20
“Stock tyres have done 25k miles and the rears are now approaching the limit. Plan to replace all 4 for continuity and want to use this opportunity to run all seasons. Car is a Model 3 SR+ on 18" rims. Was originally looking at the Vredestein Quatrac Pro but during a search found that Kumho now do a very well priced option (£515 fully fitted). I've used Kumho tyres previously on a heavy BMW 5 series estate and was really happy with the grip and longevity. Does anyone have any particular experience with the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 on a Tesla 3/Y? These have the 3PMSF (Three Peak Mountain Snow Flake) marking on them, which from 5 mins of research appears to be a new standard replacing/alongside M+S (mud and snow). One purpose of getting the all seasons is the ability to drive in European countries that mandate tyres suitable for winter conditions at certain times of the year.”
r/tires
·9 upvotes ·2024-11-15
“Kumho HA32 fast wear Hey all, would just like to share my experience with the solus ha32 4 season by kumho. These tires were installed at 173,000km last September and currently have 188,000km… around 15,000km give or take 10,000 miles in all types of weather. They are nearing end of life already.. thoughts? Overall they do ok in the snow but arent amazing. Noise isnt horrible, but the wear holy man this is crazy. I had the front suspension replaced as well as an alignment on the day of tire installation. Read more”
r/Hyundai
·4 upvotes ·2026-07-17
“Best Affordable Tires Hello! I need to get all four tires replaced on my 2019 Hyundai ELANTRA SEL and I’m looking for an affordable All Weather tire recommendations. Car might see three big days of snow (based in Kansas but probably going to be out of state when that weather is occurring). Other than that, just mild flurry’s, nothing that really sticks. It’s really hard with the budget we have which is around $600 for all 4. Not sure if we’re gonna find any good ones within that range but thought I’d ask people who know what they’re talking about before I just go with the cheapest tire I can find and pray I don’t spin out lol. TYIA! Edit/Update: Thank you to everyone who replied! I ended up going with Kumho SOLUS 4S HA32 tires. I know they’re not the greatest but since I will most likely be out of Kansas when they have their heavy snow winter weather we just needed some good tires for basically just dry road and rain👏 They were cheaper at Walmart and used the American Tires price match to get them for cheaper! Would’ve gotten them installed through Walmart to save but just in case something happens in Kansas the Discount Tires is more accessible and with tire coverage will be a cheaper repairs. Thank you again! Read more”
Top themes
#Affordable Pricing#Fast Tread Wear#Winter Performance#Quiet and Comfortable#All-Weather Capability
Based on 29 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Milestar Weatherguard AW365 | B · Kumho Solus 4S HA32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 39 | 106 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 13″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 8 - 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 500 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 50 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 31 | 31 |
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Milestar Weatherguard AW365
66
/ 100
Kumho Solus 4S HA32
Narrow edge: Milestar Weatherguard AW365 — better dry, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Solus 4S HA32 if noise matters most to you. Milestar Weatherguard AW365 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Milestar Weatherguard AW365 scores 68 vs 61 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 scores 71 vs 65 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Milestar Weatherguard AW365 scores 65 vs 60 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Milestar Weatherguard AW365 scores 70 vs 65 on treadwear.
Tire A · Milestar Weatherguard AW365
Tire B · Kumho Solus 4S HA32
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Weatherguard AW365 or Solus 4S HA32?
Which is better in the wet, Weatherguard AW365 or Solus 4S HA32?
Milestar Weatherguard AW365, 74 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Weatherguard AW365 or Solus 4S HA32?
Milestar Weatherguard AW365, 68 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Weatherguard AW365 or Solus 4S HA32?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Weatherguard AW365 or Solus 4S HA32?
Kumho Solus 4S HA32, 71 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Weatherguard AW365 or Solus 4S HA32?
Milestar Weatherguard AW365, 65 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Weatherguard AW365 or Solus 4S HA32?
Milestar Weatherguard AW365, 70 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology