tirewheelguide

Nexen CP641 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Nexen CP641 vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 48 + 35 owner reviews. How we score

Geolandar H/T G056 is ahead, 67–57

Check price on Amazon · Geolandar H/T G056 or CP641 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen CP641
Tire ANexen

CP641

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 48 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 55

    Dry

    Geolandar H/T G056 +16
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCP641Geolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online4873

    CP641: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.8 = 55

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71

    No road tests of dry for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 57

    Wet

    Geolandar H/T G056 +13
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCP641Geolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5170

    CP641: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 57

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70

    No road tests of wet for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    Level
    58
    Why this score
    SourceCP641Geolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5050

    CP641: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 58

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 58

    No road tests of snow for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    Geolandar H/T G056 +12
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCP641Geolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5269

    CP641: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.6 = 57

    Geolandar H/T G056: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 63

    Noise

    Geolandar H/T G056 +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCP641Geolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5972

    CP641: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 63

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of noise for CP641 or Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    Geolandar H/T G056 +6
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCP641Geolandar H/T G056
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5363

    CP641: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 58

    Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for CP641. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    Geolandar H/T G056 +17
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCP641Geolandar H/T G056
    Reviews found online5168
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen CP641Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Relative Score 57 67
Dry 55 71
Wet 57 70
Snow 58 58
Comfort 57 69
Noise 63 69
Treadwear 58 64
Handling (owners) 51 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CP641

± 7

Geolandar H/T G056

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CP641

Pros

  • Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
  • Impressive tread life and durability
  • Comfortable ride quality with low noise for many users

Cons

  • Poor wet weather grip and frequent slipping/aquaplaning
  • Excessive road noise or roaring reported by several users
  • Lackluster steering feedback and vague cornering confidence
All owner themes in the CP641 review

Tire B Geolandar H/T G056

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry pavement handling and stability
  • Impressive tread longevity for many users

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
  • Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
  • Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Geolandar H/T G056 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen CP641 B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—56
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
UTQG400 A A720 A A
Treadwear warranty55,000 mi70,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen CP641

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056

Winner: Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 68 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 71 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 70 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 69 vs 57 on comfort.

Tire A · Nexen CP641
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CP641 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Which is better in the wet, CP641 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 70 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CP641 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 71 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CP641 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 58 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, CP641 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 69 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CP641 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 69 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CP641 or Geolandar H/T G056?

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 64 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology