Toyo Proxes 1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Nexen CP661 vs Toyo Proxes 1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: CP661 and Proxes 1 are level at 61.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen CP661
Tire ANexen

CP661

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 11 reviews

Toyo Proxes 1
Tire BToyo

Proxes 1

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    Proxes 1 +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCP661Proxes 1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5662

    CP661: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 60

    Proxes 1: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64

    No road tests of dry for CP661. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes 1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 62

    Wet

    Level
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCP661Proxes 1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5858

    CP661: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 62

    Proxes 1: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 62

    No road tests of wet for CP661. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes 1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 56

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCP661Proxes 1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online45–

    CP661: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 56

    No road tests of snow for CP661. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    CP661 +5
    56
    Why this score
    SourceCP661Proxes 1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5851

    CP661: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 61

    Proxes 1: 40% × 65 (est.) + 60% × 50.7 = 56

    No road tests of comfort for CP661. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes 1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 63

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCP661Proxes 1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online57–

    CP661: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 63

    No road tests of noise for CP661. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 62

    Treadwear

    CP661 +4
    58
    Why this score
    SourceCP661Proxes 1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online5952

    CP661: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.1 = 62

    Proxes 1: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 58

    No road tests of treadwear for CP661. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes 1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 59

    Handling (owners)

    CP661 +5
    54
    Why this score
    SourceCP661Proxes 1
    Reviews found online5954
Scores at a glance
Nexen CP661 vs Toyo Proxes 1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen CP661Toyo Proxes 1
Relative Score 61 61
Dry 60 64
Wet 62 62
Snow 56 –
Comfort 61 56
Noise 63 –
Treadwear 62 58
Handling (owners) 59 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

CP661

± 8

Proxes 1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CP661

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium alternatives.
  • Reliable and consistent grip in both wet and dry weather conditions.
  • Impressive tread life, with some users reporting significantly higher mileage than premium tires.

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread wear reports, with some users experiencing premature replacement intervals.
  • Performance is optimized for standard commuting rather than high-performance driving.
  • Limited availability of specific speed ratings or sizes for specialized vehicles.
All owner themes in the CP661 review

Tire B Proxes 1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet weather grip
  • Improved steering feedback and handling characteristics
  • Competitive price point

Cons

  • Extremely rapid tread wear, particularly under high-torque conditions
  • Poor rolling resistance
  • Uneven tread wear patterns, specifically premature shoulder degradation
All owner themes in the Proxes 1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen CP661 B · Toyo Proxes 1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available11—
Rim diameters13″ – 17″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG400 A B240 AA A
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen CP661

Toyo Proxes 1

Too close to call: Nexen CP661 and Toyo Proxes 1 are within 2 points overall. Nexen CP661 is stronger on comfort and treadwear. Toyo Proxes 1 is stronger on dry. Nexen CP661 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Proxes 1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen CP661 scores 61 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Nexen CP661 scores 62 vs 58 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes 1 scores 64 vs 60 on dry.

Tire A · Nexen CP661
Tire B · Toyo Proxes 1

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CP661 or Proxes 1?

Which is better in the wet, CP661 or Proxes 1?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 62 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, CP661 or Proxes 1?

Toyo Proxes 1, 64 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, CP661 or Proxes 1?

Nexen CP661, 61 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CP661 or Proxes 1?

Nexen CP661, 62 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology