Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 11 reviews
Nexen CP661 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +869Why this score
Source CP661 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 58 70 -
63
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +972Why this score
Source CP661 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 61 73 -
57
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source CP661 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 48 – -
65
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +772Why this score
Source CP661 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 62 74 -
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source CP661 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 60 – -
64
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +165Why this score
Source CP661 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 62 65 -
61
Handling
BluEarth Es ES32 +1273Why this score
Source CP661 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 61 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen CP661 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 70 |
| Dry | 61 | 69 |
| Wet | 63 | 72 |
| Snow | 57 | – |
| Comfort | 65 | 72 |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 64 | 65 |
| Handling | 61 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
CP661
BluEarth Es ES32
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CP661
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium alternatives.
- Reliable and consistent grip in both wet and dry weather conditions.
- Impressive tread life, with some users reporting significantly higher mileage than premium tires.
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear reports, with some users experiencing premature replacement intervals.
- Performance is optimized for standard commuting rather than high-performance driving.
- Limited availability of specific speed ratings or sizes for specialized vehicles.
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen CP661 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 11 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 17″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 A B | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen CP661
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 61 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 63 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 69 vs 61 on dry.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.