Head-to-head Updated

Nexen CP661 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ANexen

CP661

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCP661BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online5870
  2. 63

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +9
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCP661BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6173
  3. 57

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCP661BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online48–
  4. 65

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +7
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCP661BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6274
  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCP661BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online60–
  6. 64

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCP661BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6265
  7. 61

    Handling

    BluEarth Es ES32 +12
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCP661BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6173
Scores at a glance
Nexen CP661 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen CP661Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 63 70
Dry 61 69
Wet 63 72
Snow 57 –
Comfort 65 72
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 64 65
Handling 61 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

CP661

BluEarth Es ES32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CP661

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium alternatives.
  • Reliable and consistent grip in both wet and dry weather conditions.
  • Impressive tread life, with some users reporting significantly higher mileage than premium tires.

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread wear reports, with some users experiencing premature replacement intervals.
  • Performance is optimized for standard commuting rather than high-performance driving.
  • Limited availability of specific speed ratings or sizes for specialized vehicles.
All owner themes in the CP661 review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen CP661 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1164
Rim diameters13″ – 17″13″ – 18″
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG400 A B—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen CP661

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 69 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · Nexen CP661
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Leads

BluEarth Es ES32

Amazon