Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 6 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N Fera AU5 vs Michelin Primacy 4+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 10 road tests and 6 + 39 owner reviews. How we score
Primacy 4+ is ahead, 78–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 10 tests Owners 70 · 39 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (abrasion)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
54
Dry
Primacy 4+ +2478Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 46 71 N Fera AU5: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.2 = 54
Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.3 + 40% × 70.5 = 78
No road tests of dry for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
55
Wet
Primacy 4+ +2479Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 50 74 N Fera AU5: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 55
Primacy 4+: 60% × 82.6 + 40% × 73.8 = 79
No road tests of wet for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Comfort
Primacy 4+ +1071Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 57 69 N Fera AU5: 40% × 66.9 (est.) + 60% × 56.9 = 61
Primacy 4+: 40% × 73.3 + 60% × 69 = 71
No road tests of comfort for N Fera AU5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests – 77 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Primacy 4+: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
57
Treadwear
Primacy 4+ +2885Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 95 Reviews found online 51 69 N Fera AU5: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57
Primacy 4+: 60% × 95.3 + 40% × 68.9 = 85
No road tests of treadwear for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
54
Handling (owners)
Primacy 4+ +1165Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 Primacy 4+ Reviews found online 54 65 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison78Why this score
Source N Fera AU5 Primacy 4+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 78
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera AU5 | Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 78 |
| Dry | 54 | 78 |
| Wet | 55 | 79 |
| Comfort | 61 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 85 |
| Handling (owners) | 54 | 65 |
| Efficiency | – | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
56
/ 100
N Fera AU5
78
/ 100
Primacy 4+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera AU5
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and longevity, lasting multiple years of daily commuting
- Very quiet and comfortable ride quality with smooth highway manners
- Soft sidewalls contribute to high comfort levels even at higher tire pressures
Cons
- Softer sidewalls lead to noticeable flex and reduced responsiveness in hard cornering
- Lower dry grip levels compared to more aggressive performance tires like the Nexen N Fera SU1
- Potential for traction loss or wheel spin during wet weather take-offs, particularly on powerful rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Tire B Primacy 4+
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and a smooth, compliant 'limousine-like' feel over bumps
- Strong and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions, inspiring confidence
- Noticeable improvement in quietness and traction compared to predecessor tires or factory options
Cons
- Loud road noise and a harsh drone on rough or coarse asphalt surfaces
- Soft sidewalls can reduce steering agility and initial responsiveness compared to dedicated sport tires
- High premium price point relative to competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera AU5 | B · Michelin Primacy 4+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
56
/ 100
Nexen N Fera AU5
78
/ 100
Michelin Primacy 4+
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4+ — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N Fera AU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 85 vs 57 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 78 vs 54 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 79 vs 55 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Primacy 4+ scores 65 vs 54 on handling.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera AU5
Tire B · Michelin Primacy 4+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera AU5 or Primacy 4+?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera AU5 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 79 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera AU5 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 78 vs 54 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera AU5 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 71 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera AU5 or Primacy 4+?
Michelin Primacy 4+, 85 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology