Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Fera AU5 vs Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 204 owner reviews. How we score

Geolandar CV G058 is ahead, 81–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Fera AU5
Tire ANexen

N Fera AU5

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 53

    Dry

    Geolandar CV G058 +27
    80
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5Geolandar CV G058
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online4686

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 58.7 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 53

    Geolandar CV G058: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 86.3 = 80

    No road tests of dry for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar CV G058. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 55

    Wet

    Geolandar CV G058 +30
    85
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5Geolandar CV G058
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 81 (est.)
    Reviews found online4990

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 55

    Geolandar CV G058: 60% × 81.1 (est.) + 40% × 89.7 = 85

    No road tests of wet for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar CV G058. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    79
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5Geolandar CV G058
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online–85

    Geolandar CV G058: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 85.1 = 79

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar CV G058. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Geolandar CV G058 +20
    80
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5Geolandar CV G058
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online5685

    N Fera AU5: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.3 = 60

    Geolandar CV G058: 40% × 71.9 (est.) + 60% × 84.6 = 80

    No road tests of comfort for N Fera AU5 or Geolandar CV G058. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5Geolandar CV G058
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–83

    Geolandar CV G058: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 82.8 = 73

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar CV G058. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    Geolandar CV G058 +21
    78
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5Geolandar CV G058
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online5285

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 57

    Geolandar CV G058: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 85.1 = 78

    No road tests of treadwear for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar CV G058. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    Geolandar CV G058 +27
    81
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera AU5Geolandar CV G058
    Reviews found online5481
Scores at a glance
Nexen N Fera AU5 vs Yokohama Geolandar CV G058: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N Fera AU5Yokohama Geolandar CV G058
Relative Score 55 81
Dry 53 80
Wet 55 85
Snow – 79
Comfort 60 80
Noise – 73
Treadwear 57 78
Handling (owners) 54 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N Fera AU5

± 8

Geolandar CV G058

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Fera AU5

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity, lasting multiple years of daily commuting
  • Very quiet and comfortable ride quality with smooth highway manners
  • Soft sidewalls contribute to high comfort levels even at higher tire pressures

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls lead to noticeable flex and reduced responsiveness in hard cornering
  • Lower dry grip levels compared to more aggressive performance tires like the Nexen N Fera SU1
  • Potential for traction loss or wheel spin during wet weather take-offs, particularly on powerful rear-wheel-drive vehicles
All owner themes in the N Fera AU5 review

Tire B Geolandar CV G058

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
  • Noticeably low road noise and quiet highway driving
  • High ride comfort with supple bump absorption

Cons

  • Slightly less solid handling or stability at very high speeds (above 150 km/h)
  • Some drivers report a slight disconnect in steering precision compared to premium alternatives like Michelin
  • A few users experienced higher-than-desired tread wear on specific fitments
All owner themes in the Geolandar CV G058 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Fera AU5 B · Yokohama Geolandar CV G058
CategorySummerAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—47
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—740 A A
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Fera AU5

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058

Winner: Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N Fera AU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 scores 85 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 scores 80 vs 53 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 scores 81 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058 scores 78 vs 57 on treadwear.

Tire A · Nexen N Fera AU5
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar CV G058

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Fera AU5 or Geolandar CV G058?

Which is better in the wet, N Fera AU5 or Geolandar CV G058?

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058, 85 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera AU5 or Geolandar CV G058?

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058, 80 vs 53 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, N Fera AU5 or Geolandar CV G058?

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058, 80 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N Fera AU5 or Geolandar CV G058?

Yokohama Geolandar CV G058, 78 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology