tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N'Fera AU7 vs Continental WinterContact TS 810 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 15 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

N'Fera AU7 is ahead, 69–60

Check price on Amazon · N'Fera AU7 or WinterContact TS 810 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N'Fera AU7
Tire ANexen

N'Fera AU7

All-Season Premium Touring tires

± 9Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 15 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    N'Fera AU7 +8
    61
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera AU7WinterContact TS 810
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6958

    N'Fera AU7: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69

    WinterContact TS 810: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 61

    No road tests of dry for N'Fera AU7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for WinterContact TS 810. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 72

    Wet

    N'Fera AU7 +8
    64
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera AU7WinterContact TS 810
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7262

    N'Fera AU7: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72

    WinterContact TS 810: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64

    No road tests of wet for N'Fera AU7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for WinterContact TS 810. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 65

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera AU7WinterContact TS 810
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online61–

    N'Fera AU7: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.6 = 65

    No road tests of snow for N'Fera AU7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    N'Fera AU7 +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera AU7WinterContact TS 810
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6658

    N'Fera AU7: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.1 = 67

    WinterContact TS 810: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.3 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for N'Fera AU7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for WinterContact TS 810. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera AU7WinterContact TS 810
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online65–

    N'Fera AU7: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66

    No road tests of noise for N'Fera AU7. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    N'Fera AU7 +7
    56
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera AU7WinterContact TS 810
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests63≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6249

    N'Fera AU7: 60% × 62.9 + 40% × 62.3 = 63

    WinterContact TS 810: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 810. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    N'Fera AU7 +15
    53
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera AU7WinterContact TS 810
    Reviews found online6853
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen N'Fera AU7Continental WinterContact TS 810
Relative Score 69 60
Dry 69 61
Wet 72 64
Snow 65 –
Comfort 67 62
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 63 56
Handling (owners) 68 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 9

N'Fera AU7

± 8

WinterContact TS 810

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N'Fera AU7

Pros

  • Exceptional value for the price point
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet, dry, and light snow traction

Cons

  • Potential for premature wear or cupping reported by some users
  • Prone to wandering or tracking poorly on metal bridge gratings
  • Softer compounds may be susceptible to quicker aging in harsh climates
All owner themes in the N'Fera AU7 review

Tire B WinterContact TS 810

Pros

  • Reliable traction in snow and icy conditions
  • Strong performance in cold, wet weather
  • Well-balanced handling characteristics across various road surfaces

Cons

  • Performance degradation in warmer or dry conditions
  • Inconsistent snow and ice performance reported by some users
  • Poor customer service experiences associated with the brand
All owner themes in the WinterContact TS 810 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N'Fera AU7 B · Continental WinterContact TS 810
CategoryAll-Season Premium Touring tiresWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available495
Rim diameters16″ – 20″15″ – 17″
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG500 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N'Fera AU7

Continental WinterContact TS 810

Winner: Nexen N'Fera AU7 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N'Fera AU7 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental WinterContact TS 810 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N'Fera AU7 scores 68 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N'Fera AU7 scores 69 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N'Fera AU7 scores 72 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Nexen N'Fera AU7 scores 63 vs 56 on treadwear.

Tire A · Nexen N'Fera AU7
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental WinterContact TS 810
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N'Fera AU7 or WinterContact TS 810?

Which is better in the wet, N'Fera AU7 or WinterContact TS 810?

Nexen N'Fera AU7, 72 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N'Fera AU7 or WinterContact TS 810?

Nexen N'Fera AU7, 69 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, N'Fera AU7 or WinterContact TS 810?

Nexen N'Fera AU7, 67 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N'Fera AU7 or WinterContact TS 810?

Nexen N'Fera AU7, 63 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology