Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 15 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N'Fera AU7 vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 15 + 15 owner reviews. How we score
N'Fera AU7 is ahead, 67–61
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 60 · 15 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
N'Fera AU7 +1950Why this score
Source N'Fera AU7 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 42 Reviews found online 70 61 N'Fera AU7: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 69
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 42.3 + 40% × 60.5 = 50
No road tests of dry for N'Fera AU7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
N'Fera AU7 +1260Why this score
Source N'Fera AU7 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 57 Reviews found online 72 65 N'Fera AU7: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 72
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57 + 40% × 64.5 = 60
No road tests of wet for N'Fera AU7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Snow
N'Fera AU7 +956Why this score
Source N'Fera AU7 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 61 48 N'Fera AU7: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 56
No road tests of snow for N'Fera AU7. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
68
Comfort
N'Fera AU7 +464Why this score
Source N'Fera AU7 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 67 65 N'Fera AU7: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 66.9 = 68
Advan Sport AS: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 64.6 = 64
No road tests of comfort for N'Fera AU7. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Noise
Advan Sport AS +369Why this score
Source N'Fera AU7 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 65 64 N'Fera AU7: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 66
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63.7 = 69
No road tests of noise for N'Fera AU7. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
Advan Sport AS +1173Why this score
Source N'Fera AU7 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 62 81 Reviews found online 62 60 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 60% 100% N'Fera AU7: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 62.2 = 62
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 81 + 40% × 59.9 = 73
-
69
Handling (owners)
N'Fera AU7 +663Why this score
Source N'Fera AU7 Advan Sport AS Reviews found online 69 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N'Fera AU7 | Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 61 |
| Dry | 69 | 50 |
| Wet | 72 | 60 |
| Snow | 65 | 56 |
| Comfort | 68 | 64 |
| Noise | 66 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
N'Fera AU7
61
/ 100
Advan Sport AS
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Nexen N'Fera AU7 finished ahead 0 times and Yokohama Advan Sport AS 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | N'Fera AU7 | Advan Sport AS | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 60% | 100% | −40.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #11/19 | #9/19 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires · 225/40R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N'Fera AU7
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price point
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet, dry, and light snow traction
Cons
- Potential for premature wear or cupping reported by some users
- Prone to wandering or tracking poorly on metal bridge gratings
- Softer compounds may be susceptible to quicker aging in harsh climates
Tire B Advan Sport AS
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
- Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
- Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
- Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
- Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N'Fera AU7 | B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season Premium Touring tires | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 49 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 17″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Nexen N'Fera AU7
61
/ 100
Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Winner: Nexen N'Fera AU7 — better dry, wet and snow. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if treadwear and noise matter most to you. Nexen N'Fera AU7 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N'Fera AU7 scores 69 vs 50 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N'Fera AU7 scores 72 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 73 vs 62 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Nexen N'Fera AU7 scores 65 vs 56 on snow.
Tire A · Nexen N'Fera AU7
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N'Fera AU7 or Advan Sport AS?
Which is better in the wet, N'Fera AU7 or Advan Sport AS?
Nexen N'Fera AU7, 72 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N'Fera AU7 or Advan Sport AS?
Nexen N'Fera AU7, 69 vs 50 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, N'Fera AU7 or Advan Sport AS?
Nexen N'Fera AU7, 65 vs 56 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, N'Fera AU7 or Advan Sport AS?
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 69 vs 66 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, N'Fera AU7 or Advan Sport AS?
Nexen N'Fera AU7, 68 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N'Fera AU7 or Advan Sport AS?
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 73 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology