Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N'Fera RU5 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 16 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

N'Fera RU5 is ahead, 73–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N'Fera RU5
Tire ANexen

N'Fera RU5

All-Season Ultra High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 16 reviews

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Tire BToyo

Proxes CF2 SUV

Summer

± 9

Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 72 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    N'Fera RU5 +10
    62
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 71 (est.)56
    Reviews found online7573

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 72

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 72.5 = 62

    No road tests of dry for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 74

    Wet

    N'Fera RU5 +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 73 (est.)65
    Reviews found online7672

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 74

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 65.4 + 40% × 71.6 = 68

    No road tests of wet for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 60

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online52–

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 60

    No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    N'Fera RU5 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 70 (est.)62
    Reviews found online7675

    N'Fera RU5: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 40% × 61.9 + 60% × 75.2 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 69

    Noise

    N'Fera RU5 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)67
    Reviews found online74≈ 66 (est.)

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 69

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 67

    No road tests of noise for N'Fera RU5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Proxes CF2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    N'Fera RU5 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7572

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    N'Fera RU5 +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes CF2 SUV
    Reviews found online7372
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    56
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes CF2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–56
Scores at a glance
Nexen N'Fera RU5 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N'Fera RU5Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Relative Score 73 67
Dry 72 62
Wet 74 68
Snow 60 –
Comfort 74 70
Noise 69 67
Treadwear 72 70
Handling (owners) 73 72
Efficiency – 56

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

N'Fera RU5

± 9

Proxes CF2 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N'Fera RU5

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to major competitor brands
  • Impressive tread life and durability, with some users reporting high mileage and slow wear rates
  • Strong grip and confident handling on both dry and wet roads

Cons

  • Subpar traction and performance in snow and winter conditions, with specific complaints regarding ice and snow handling
  • Noise levels are average, with some users noting they are not exceptionally quiet
  • Mixed reviews on specialized winter-weather safety outside of mild rainy climates
All owner themes in the N'Fera RU5 review

Tire B Proxes CF2 SUV

Pros

  • Significantly quieter and smoother ride compared to stock or competitor tires
  • Excellent dry grip and handling performance
  • Good value for money with favorable durability and wear characteristics

Cons

  • Wet grip performance may degrade or feel less confident over time for some users
  • Occasional low-frequency rolling noise noted on rough road surfaces
  • Wet weather traction can reach its limits during spirited cornering
All owner themes in the Proxes CF2 SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N'Fera RU5 B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
CategoryAll-Season Ultra High Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available429
Rim diameters16″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG500 A A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N'Fera RU5

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

Winner: Nexen N'Fera RU5 — better dry, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen N'Fera RU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 72 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 74 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 74 vs 70 on comfort.

Tire A · Nexen N'Fera RU5
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N'Fera RU5 or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, N'Fera RU5 or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 74 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N'Fera RU5 or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 72 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, N'Fera RU5 or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, N'Fera RU5 or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Nexen N'Fera RU5, 74 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N'Fera RU5 or Proxes CF2 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology