tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N'Fera RU5 vs Toyo Proxes ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 16 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: N'Fera RU5 72, Proxes ST 71.

Check price on Amazon · N'Fera RU5 Check price on Amazon · Proxes ST
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N'Fera RU5
Tire ANexen

N'Fera RU5

All-Season Ultra High Performance tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 16 reviews

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire BToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    N'Fera RU5 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7775

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 74

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    No road tests of dry for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Level
    75
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7777

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    No road tests of wet for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 60

    Snow

    Proxes ST +6
    66
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5364

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.1 = 60

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 74

    Comfort

    N'Fera RU5 +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8074

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 79.6 = 74

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU5 or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online75–

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.5 = 70

    No road tests of noise for N'Fera RU5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    N'Fera RU5 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7372

    N'Fera RU5: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    N'Fera RU5 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceN'Fera RU5Proxes ST
    Reviews found online7771
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen N'Fera RU5Toyo Proxes ST
Relative Score 72 71
Dry 74 72
Wet 75 75
Snow 60 66
Comfort 74 72
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 70 69
Handling (owners) 77 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

N'Fera RU5

Proxes ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N'Fera RU5

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to major competitor brands
  • Impressive tread life and durability, with some users reporting high mileage and slow wear rates
  • Strong grip and confident handling on both dry and wet roads

Cons

  • Subpar traction and performance in snow and winter conditions, with specific complaints regarding ice and snow handling
  • Noise levels are average, with some users noting they are not exceptionally quiet
  • Mixed reviews on specialized winter-weather safety outside of mild rainy climates
All owner themes in the N'Fera RU5 review

Tire B Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N'Fera RU5 B · Toyo Proxes ST
CategoryAll-Season Ultra High Performance tiresAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available41
Rim diameters16″ – 18″19″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG500 A A—
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N'Fera RU5

Toyo Proxes ST

Too close to call: Nexen N'Fera RU5 and Toyo Proxes ST are within 2 points overall. Nexen N'Fera RU5 is stronger on handling. Toyo Proxes ST is stronger on snow. Nexen N'Fera RU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 77 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Toyo Proxes ST scores 66 vs 60 on snow.

Tire A · Nexen N'Fera RU5
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Toyo Proxes ST
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N'Fera RU5 or Proxes ST?

Which is better in the wet, N'Fera RU5 or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, N'Fera RU5 or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, N'Fera RU5 or Proxes ST?

Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, N'Fera RU5 or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, N'Fera RU5 or Proxes ST?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology