tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Fera SU1 vs Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 164 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Arrowspeed CP661 is ahead, 69–63

Check price on Amazon · Arrowspeed CP661 or N Fera SU1 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire ANexen

N Fera SU1

Summer

± 7

Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 62 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Arrowspeed CP661 +9
    68
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1Arrowspeed CP661
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests55≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6469

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 55 + 40% × 64.2 = 59

    Arrowspeed CP661: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Arrowspeed CP661. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Arrowspeed CP661 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1Arrowspeed CP661
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests62≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6771

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 61.9 + 40% × 67.3 = 64

    Arrowspeed CP661: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    No road tests of wet for Arrowspeed CP661. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1Arrowspeed CP661
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online50–

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58

    No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Arrowspeed CP661 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1Arrowspeed CP661
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests66≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6667

    N Fera SU1: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 65.5 = 66

    Arrowspeed CP661: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 66.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Arrowspeed CP661. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 69

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1Arrowspeed CP661
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests69–
    Reviews found online70–

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 69.7 = 69

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Arrowspeed CP661 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1Arrowspeed CP661
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5969

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.2 = 66

    Arrowspeed CP661: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for Arrowspeed CP661. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    Arrowspeed CP661 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1Arrowspeed CP661
    Reviews found online6669
  8. 76

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera SU1Arrowspeed CP661
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests76–
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen N Fera SU1Nexen Arrowspeed CP661
Relative Score 63 69
Dry 59 68
Wet 64 71
Snow 58 –
Comfort 66 67
Noise 69 –
Treadwear 66 68
Handling (owners) 66 69
Efficiency 76 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

N Fera SU1

± 8

Arrowspeed CP661

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Fera SU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
  • Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
  • Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
  • Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
All owner themes in the N Fera SU1 review

Tire B Arrowspeed CP661

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • High tread longevity and durability on light vehicles
  • Predictable handling in both wet and dry conditions

Cons

  • Reports of premature sidewall cracking or splitting
  • Performance limitations during high-speed wet weather driving
  • Initial 'loose' feeling during the break-in period
All owner themes in the Arrowspeed CP661 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Fera SU1 B · Nexen Arrowspeed CP661
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available97—
Rim diameters15″ – 24″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG300 A A—
Treadwear warranty25,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Fera SU1

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661

Winner: Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 — better dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 scores 68 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661 scores 71 vs 64 on wet.

Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU1
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen Arrowspeed CP661
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Fera SU1 or Arrowspeed CP661?

Which is better in the wet, N Fera SU1 or Arrowspeed CP661?

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661, 71 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera SU1 or Arrowspeed CP661?

Nexen Arrowspeed CP661, 68 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, N Fera SU1 or Arrowspeed CP661?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, N Fera SU1 or Arrowspeed CP661?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology