Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 62 · 164 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N Fera SU1 vs Toyo Proxes Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 20 road tests and 164 + 1,277 owner reviews. How we score
N Fera SU1 is ahead, 63–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 58 · 20 tests Owners 53 · 1,277 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Had the older version on an SRT8. Grip & performance were great. But wear was not. 10K miles(2 rotations) is all I got.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Proxes Sport +362Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 18 tests 55 61 Reviews found online 64 64 N Fera SU1: 60% × 55 + 40% × 64.2 = 59
Proxes Sport: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 64.1 = 62
-
64
Wet
Proxes Sport +670Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 18 tests 62 77 Reviews found online 67 59 N Fera SU1: 60% × 61.9 + 40% × 67.3 = 64
Proxes Sport: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 59.4 = 70
-
58
Snow
N Fera SU1 +2533Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 48 (est.) Reviews found online 50 10 N Fera SU1: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58
Proxes Sport: 60% × 48 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 33
No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Proxes Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
66
Comfort
N Fera SU1 +1056Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 5 tests 66 50 Reviews found online 66 59 N Fera SU1: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 65.5 = 66
Proxes Sport: 40% × 50.1 + 60% × 59.4 = 56
-
69
Noise
Proxes Sport +271Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 11 tests 69 72 Reviews found online 70 69 N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 69.7 = 69
Proxes Sport: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 68.6 = 71
-
66
Treadwear
N Fera SU1 +2343Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests 70 36 Reviews found online 59 54 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 62% 46% N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.2 = 66
Proxes Sport: 60% × 35.5 + 40% × 54.2 = 43
-
66
Handling (owners)
N Fera SU1 +1056Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 Proxes Sport Reviews found online 66 56 -
76
Efficiency
N Fera SU1 +3541Why this score
Source N Fera SU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 12 tests 76 41
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU1 | Toyo Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 56 |
| Dry | 59 | 62 |
| Wet | 64 | 70 |
| Snow | 58 | 33 |
| Comfort | 66 | 56 |
| Noise | 69 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 43 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 56 |
| Efficiency | 76 | 41 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
N Fera SU1
56
/ 100
Proxes Sport
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Nexen N Fera SU1 finished ahead 1 times and Toyo Proxes Sport 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | N Fera SU1 | Proxes Sport | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 92% #7/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 95% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 98% #7/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 95% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 60% #7/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 98% #3/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 82% #8/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 94% #8/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 94% #5/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 78% #7/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 97% #4/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 60% #10/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 99% #3/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 98% #6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 62% | 46% | +15.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 99% #2/6 · 2023 APAC Tyre Test | 86% #7/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Tyre Weight | Other | 74% #10/10 · 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 95% #4/10 · 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #14/22 | #15/22 | – | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera SU1
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
- Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
- Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
- Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
- Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
Tire B Proxes Sport
Pros
- Significantly more affordable than premium tier summer tires while offering around 80-90% of the performance
- Commendable grip and handling in dry conditions with a progressive, predictable breakaway
- Low road noise and generally high ride comfort compared to factory run-flats or older performance tires
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, with multiple users reporting replacement necessary between 6,000 and 12,000 miles
- Inconsistent or slippery wet-weather traction and occasional tendency to hydroplane in heavy standing water
- Stiff sidewalls on certain sizes leading to a harsher ride quality or increased noise for some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Nexen N Fera SU1
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Toyo Proxes Sport
Community sentiment toward the Toyo Proxes Sport family is generally positive, with drivers praising its ride comfort, good value for money, and competent daily street grip. Many owners appreciate unique size options like 345/25-20 for high-performance cars, though enthusiasts note that dedicated track tires offer superior turn-in sharpness and ultimate traction. A common topic of discussion is the scarcity of extensive real-world reviews, particularly regarding newer variants.
forum.miata.net
“Quote: Originally Posted by Brian Goodwin I own both the Falken and Toyo Proxes Sport, both in 235/40-17. The Toyo rides better, the Falken goes faster through the turns, and turn-in response is much quicker. I have not bothered to take the Toyo to the track because around our fun canyon roads it is clearly slower and with less grip than the Falken. The Falken feels like a race tire, complete with stiff sidewall support for crisp turn-in, used those for track and autocross over the last few months, including two wins in class at autocross. The Toyo feels like a street tire, much like the Continental ECS, complete with much lower weight because sidewalls are comparatively soft and squishy next to the Falken. If you want a soft daily driver 235/40 and you accept it is a few clicks slower than the Falken, the Toyo is great as a daily driver. But if you expect that Toyo to keep up with the Falken on track days, you will be disappointed. Great feedback, thanks Brian. Wish there were more options in this size! May just stick with the RT660s, especially now with the HKS GT2 on the car”
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2026-08-09
“I have real world experience with the Toyo Proxes Sport AS+. This may be the best all around tire on the planet IMO. I'm old and so I've tried multiple tires in real world conditions as a daily driver with performance in mind. I know every Michelin and Pirelli. I've become an expert on available tires in the USA.. What you will find with This tire: * They are immediately quiet *Resist hydroplaning in big water * Higher than expected dry performance in super hot weather for an AS * Maintain tread pattern to the death and remain quiet. These tires are next level.”
r/TyreReviews
·17 upvotes ·2026-08-27
“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money. Read more”
Top themes
#Value for money#Ride comfort#Street vs track performance#Wide fitment availability#Tread wear and longevity#Limited review availability
Based on 34 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU1 | B · Toyo Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 97 | 83 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 24″ | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 A A | 240 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | 25,000 mi | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 61 | 61 |
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Nexen N Fera SU1
56
/ 100
Toyo Proxes Sport
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better efficiency, snow and treadwear. Pick the Toyo Proxes Sport if wet and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want lower fuel or energy use
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 76 vs 41 on efficiency.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 58 vs 33 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 43 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 56 on comfort.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire B · Toyo Proxes Sport
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera SU1 or Proxes Sport?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera SU1 or Proxes Sport?
Toyo Proxes Sport, 70 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera SU1 or Proxes Sport?
Toyo Proxes Sport, 62 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, N Fera SU1 or Proxes Sport?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 58 vs 33 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, N Fera SU1 or Proxes Sport?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera SU1 or Proxes Sport?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera SU1 or Proxes Sport?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 43 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, N Fera SU1 or Proxes Sport?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 76 vs 41 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology