Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 20 road tests and 2,189 + 1,277 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 65–56
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,189 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Tests 58 · 20 tests Owners 53 · 1,277 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Had the older version on an SRT8. Grip & performance were great. But wear was not. 10K miles(2 rotations) is all I got.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 18 tests | 78 | 61 |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 64 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 3–0 | 97% | 92% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 | 99% | 99% |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 74
Proxes Sport: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 64.1 = 62
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 18 tests | 70 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 59 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 93% | 97% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–3 | 87% | 91% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 96% | 97% |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 64 = 68
Proxes Sport: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 59.4 = 70
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 49 (est.) | ≈ 48 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 13 | 10 |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 49.1 (est.) + 40% × 12.7 = 35
Proxes Sport: 60% × 48 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 33
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Proxes Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests | 62 | 50 |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 59 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 56% | 78% |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.5 + 60% × 61.5 = 62
Proxes Sport: 40% × 50.1 + 60% × 59.4 = 56
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 11 tests | 75 | 72 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 69 |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 98% |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 60.1 = 69
Proxes Sport: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 68.6 = 71
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 5 tests | 75 | 36 |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 54 |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 85% | 46% |
| Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0 | 69% | 59% |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 59.4 = 69
Proxes Sport: 60% × 35.5 + 40% × 54.3 = 43
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 56 |
| Source | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 12 tests | 71 | 41 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 83% | 70% |
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 | Toyo Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 56 |
| Dry | 74 | 62 |
| Wet | 68 | 70 |
| Snow | 35 | 33 |
| Comfort | 62 | 56 |
| Noise | 69 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 43 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 56 |
| Efficiency | 71 | 41 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ADVAN Fleva V701
Proxes Sport
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 6 tests that ran both, Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 finished ahead 3 times and Toyo Proxes Sport 3 times.
| Discipline | Category | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Proxes Sport | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 97% | 92% | +4.9 | 3–0 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout · 225/45 R17 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 99% | +0.1 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 93% | 97% | −4.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% | 91% | −3.7 | 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout · 225/45 R17 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% | 97% | −1.8 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 56% | 78% | −22.2 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Noise | Noise | 100% | 98% | +1.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 85% | 46% | +38.4 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 69% | 59% | +9.7 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 83% | 70% | +12.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 71% | 81% | −9.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #14/20 | #19/20 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Value | Cost | 57% | 55% | +1.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/22 | #15/22 | – | 3–3 in 6 shared tests Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
Based on 22 community posts
Community sentiment toward the Toyo Proxes Sport family is generally positive, with drivers praising its ride comfort, good value for money, and competent daily street grip. Many owners appreciate unique size options like 345/25-20 for high-performance cars, though enthusiasts note that dedicated track tires offer superior turn-in sharpness and ultimate traction. A common topic of discussion is the scarcity of extensive real-world reviews, particularly regarding newer variants.
“I own both the Falken and Toyo Proxes Sport, both in 235/40-17. The Toyo rides better, the Falken goes faster through the turns, and turn-in response is much quicker. I have not bothered to take the Toyo to the track because around our fun canyon roads it is clearly slower and with less grip than the Falken. The Falken feels like a race tire, complete with stiff sidewall support for crisp turn-in, used those for track and autocross over the last few months, including two wins in class at autocross. The Toyo feels like a street tire, much like the Continental ECS, complete with much lower weight because sidewalls are comparatively soft and squishy next to the Falken. If you want a soft daily driver 235/40 and you accept it is a few clicks slower than the Falken, the Toyo is great as a daily driver. But if you expect that Toyo to keep up with the Falken on track days, you will be disappointed.”
“I have real world experience with the Toyo Proxes Sport AS+. This may be the best all around tire on the planet IMO. I'm old and so I've tried multiple tires in real world conditions as a daily driver with performance in mind. I know every Michelin and Pirelli. I've become an expert on available tires in the USA.. What you will find with This tire: * They are immediately quiet *Resist hydroplaning in big water * Higher than expected dry performance in super hot weather for an AS * Maintain tread pattern to the death and remain quiet. These tires are next level.”
“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money. Read more”
Based on 34 community posts
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 | B · Toyo Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 70 | 83 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 300 A A | 240 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 46 | 46 |
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Toyo Proxes Sport
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better efficiency, treadwear and handling. Where the Toyo Proxes Sport is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 41 on efficiency.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 43 on treadwear.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 72 vs 56 on handling.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 62 on dry.
Toyo Proxes Sport won 3 of 3 shared wet braking tests.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 62 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 35 vs 33 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 62 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 43 on our treadwear score.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 71 vs 41 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
