Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 56 · 6 reviews
Nexen N'Fera SUR4G vs Falken Azenis RT 615 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Azenis RT 615 leads, 62–60 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
Azenis RT 615 +365Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Azenis RT 615 Professional tests (TWG score) 60 – Reviews found online 65 63 -
71
Wet
N'Fera SUR4G +1358Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Azenis RT 615 Professional tests (TWG score) 75 – Reviews found online 67 54 -
60
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 54 – -
58
Comfort
Azenis RT 615 +361Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 48 52 -
66
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 64 – -
51
Treadwear
Azenis RT 615 +1364Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 40 64 -
55
Handling
Azenis RT 615 +863Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Azenis RT 615 Reviews found online 55 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N'Fera SUR4G | Falken Azenis RT 615 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 62 |
| Dry | 62 | 65 |
| Wet | 71 | 58 |
| Snow | 60 | – |
| Comfort | 58 | 61 |
| Noise | 66 | – |
| Treadwear | 51 | 64 |
| Handling | 55 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
N'Fera SUR4G
Azenis RT 615
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N'Fera SUR4G
Pros
- Insane level of grip on both dry and wet surfaces
- Exceptional performance in unexpected rain conditions during track events
- Competitive pricing compared to alternatives like the RS4
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall tire lifespan
- Requires careful driving speeds in heavy rain after a certain threshold
Tire B Azenis RT 615
Pros
- Excellent value for money and affordable pricing
- Impressive tread life and durability, holding up well to track days and endurance racing
- Good dry grip and predictable handling for beginners learning performance driving
Cons
- Poor performance and hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
- Harder rubber compound compared to traditional semi-slicks, limiting absolute ultimate grip
- Requires careful tire pressure tuning (such as running 3-5 psi higher) to optimize performance
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N'Fera SUR4G | B · Falken Azenis RT 615 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Trackday and Competition tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 200 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N'Fera SUR4G
Falken Azenis RT 615
Winner: Falken Azenis RT 615 — better treadwear, handling and dry. Pick the Nexen N'Fera SUR4G if wet matters most to you.
Nexen N'Fera SUR4G scores 71 vs 58 on wet.
Falken Azenis RT 615 scores 64 vs 51 on treadwear.
Falken Azenis RT 615 scores 63 vs 55 on handling.
Falken Azenis RT 615 scores 65 vs 62 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.