Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 14 reviews
Nexen N2000 vs Nitto NT555 G2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 14 + 412 owner reviews. How we score
N2000 is ahead, 68–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
N2000 +1255Why this score
Source N2000 NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 49 Reviews found online 67 64 N2000: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
NT555 G2: 60% × 49.1 + 40% × 63.8 = 55
No road tests of dry for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
N2000 +1951Why this score
Source N2000 NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 48 Reviews found online 70 54 N2000: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
NT555 G2: 60% × 48.3 + 40% × 54 = 51
No road tests of wet for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison48Why this score
Source N2000 NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online – 33 NT555 G2: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.7 = 48
No road tests of snow for NT555 G2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
Level66Why this score
Source N2000 NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 65 65 N2000: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66
NT555 G2: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 65 = 66
No road tests of comfort for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for NT555 G2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison66Why this score
Source N2000 NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 64 NT555 G2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 66
No road tests of noise for NT555 G2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
NT555 G2 +776Why this score
Source N2000 NT555 G2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 70 66 N2000: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69
NT555 G2: 60% × 83.3 + 40% × 66 = 76
No road tests of treadwear for N2000. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
63
Handling (owners)
N2000 +162Why this score
Source N2000 NT555 G2 Reviews found online 63 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N2000 | Nitto NT555 G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 59 |
| Dry | 67 | 55 |
| Wet | 70 | 51 |
| Snow | – | 48 |
| Comfort | 66 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 66 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 76 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
N2000
NT555 G2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N2000
Pros
- Exceptional value for money
- Strong dry road grip and handling feedback
- Surprisingly durable tread life for many users
Cons
- Significant decline in wet-weather traction as tread depth decreases
- Increased road noise and harsh ride quality reported by some users
- Potential for uneven wear patterns if not properly maintained
Tire B NT555 G2
Pros
- Aggressive, visually appealing tread pattern and sidewall design
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands like Michelin or Pirelli
- Long-lasting tread life and slow wear rates for a summer performance tire
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction, with multiple users reporting hydroplaning and a slippery feel in the rain
- Lack of straight-line traction and wheel spin under heavy acceleration, especially on high-horsepower RWD vehicles
- Subpar performance in cooler temperatures or cold conditions, requiring heat to grip properly
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N2000 | B · Nitto NT555 G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 88 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10.2/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 - 440 A - AA A | 320 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N2000
Nitto NT555 G2
Winner: Nexen N2000 — better wet and dry. Pick the Nitto NT555 G2 if treadwear matters most to you. Nexen N2000 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen N2000 scores 70 vs 51 on wet.
Nexen N2000 scores 67 vs 55 on dry.
Nitto NT555 G2 scores 76 vs 69 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N2000 or NT555 G2?
Which is better in the wet, N2000 or NT555 G2?
Nexen N2000, 70 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N2000 or NT555 G2?
Nexen N2000, 67 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, N2000 or NT555 G2?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, N2000 or NT555 G2?
Nitto NT555 G2, 76 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology