tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen Roadian GTX vs Sailun Atrezzo SH402 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 14 owner reviews. How we score

Roadian GTX is ahead, 58–47

Check price on Amazon · Roadian GTX or Atrezzo SH402 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen Roadian GTX
Tire ANexen

Roadian GTX

All Season

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 25 reviews

Sailun Atrezzo SH402
Tire BSailun

Atrezzo SH402

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 38 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    Roadian GTX +13
    47
    Why this score
    SourceRoadian GTXAtrezzo SH402
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online5536

    Roadian GTX: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60

    Atrezzo SH402: 60% × 54.6 (est.) + 40% × 36.1 = 47

    No road tests of dry for Roadian GTX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Atrezzo SH402. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Roadian GTX +16
    47
    Why this score
    SourceRoadian GTXAtrezzo SH402
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online6038

    Roadian GTX: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 63

    Atrezzo SH402: 60% × 52.8 (est.) + 40% × 38.2 = 47

    No road tests of wet for Roadian GTX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Atrezzo SH402. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 57

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceRoadian GTXAtrezzo SH402
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online49–

    Roadian GTX: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.2 = 57

    No road tests of snow for Roadian GTX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Roadian GTX +11
    48
    Why this score
    SourceRoadian GTXAtrezzo SH402
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5538

    Roadian GTX: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 54.7 = 59

    Atrezzo SH402: 40% × 63.4 (est.) + 60% × 38.1 = 48

    No road tests of comfort for Roadian GTX or Atrezzo SH402. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceRoadian GTXAtrezzo SH402
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online61–

    Roadian GTX: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Roadian GTX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 49

    Treadwear

    Atrezzo SH402 +1
    50
    Why this score
    SourceRoadian GTXAtrezzo SH402
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online3840

    Roadian GTX: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.9 = 49

    Atrezzo SH402: 60% × 57 (est.) + 40% × 40 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for Roadian GTX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Atrezzo SH402. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 48

    Handling (owners)

    Roadian GTX +10
    38
    Why this score
    SourceRoadian GTXAtrezzo SH402
    Reviews found online4838
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen Roadian GTXSailun Atrezzo SH402
Relative Score 58 47
Dry 60 47
Wet 63 47
Snow 57 –
Comfort 59 48
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 49 50
Handling (owners) 48 38

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Roadian GTX

± 8

Atrezzo SH402

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Roadian GTX

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable traction in wet and dry conditions for standard commuting

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with reports of rapid wear well before the expected mileage
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and vulnerability to curb damage
  • Occasional quality control issues, such as tires being out-of-round
All owner themes in the Roadian GTX review

Tire B Atrezzo SH402

Pros

  • High value-for-money price point
  • Strong dry pavement traction for casual driving
  • Excellent tread life reported by a subset of long-distance users

Cons

  • Severely compromised wet weather grip and braking performance
  • Soft sidewalls leading to poor cornering stability and 'splashy' handling
  • Inconsistent quality control regarding tread wear rates
All owner themes in the Atrezzo SH402 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen Roadian GTX B · Sailun Atrezzo SH402
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available62—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth9.5/32″—
UTQG680 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen Roadian GTX

Sailun Atrezzo SH402

Winner: Nexen Roadian GTX — better wet, dry and comfort. Where the Sailun Atrezzo SH402 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Sailun Atrezzo SH402 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen Roadian GTX scores 63 vs 47 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen Roadian GTX scores 60 vs 47 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen Roadian GTX scores 59 vs 48 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen Roadian GTX scores 48 vs 38 on handling.

Tire A · Nexen Roadian GTX
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Sailun Atrezzo SH402
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Roadian GTX or Atrezzo SH402?

Which is better in the wet, Roadian GTX or Atrezzo SH402?

Nexen Roadian GTX, 63 vs 47 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Roadian GTX or Atrezzo SH402?

Nexen Roadian GTX, 60 vs 47 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Roadian GTX or Atrezzo SH402?

Nexen Roadian GTX, 59 vs 48 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Roadian GTX or Atrezzo SH402?

Neither, by our numbers: 49 vs 50 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology