Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 3 reviews
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 vs Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 3 + 171 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Roadian H/TX RT5 70, Geolandar G91AV 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 171 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Geolandar G91AV +373Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 71 76 Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75.9 = 73
No road tests of dry for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
73
Wet
Roadian H/TX RT5 +568Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 74 67 Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 68
No road tests of wet for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Snow
Level69Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 68 68 Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 69
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
No road tests of snow for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
71
Comfort
Level71Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 74 74 Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 71
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar G91AV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison68Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 70 Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No road tests of noise for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Geolandar G91AV +569Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 62 71 Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Geolandar G91AV +576Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar G91AV Reviews found online 71 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 | Yokohama Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 71 |
| Dry | 70 | 73 |
| Wet | 73 | 68 |
| Snow | 69 | 69 |
| Comfort | 71 | 71 |
| Noise | – | 68 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Roadian H/TX RT5
Geolandar G91AV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Roadian H/TX RT5
Pros
- Strong initial traction in varied weather conditions including snow, slush, and ice
- Excellent performance for towing applications
- Impressive off-road capability, particularly in soft sand
Cons
- Noticeable decline in grip and handling characteristics after 8,000-10,000 miles
- Increased susceptibility to oversteer and instability on wet surfaces as tread wears
- Harsh ride quality and unpredictable handling at higher tire pressures
Tire B Geolandar G91AV
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on highways and city streets
- Reliable traction and confident handling in wet and dry conditions
- Good overall durability and tread longevity for daily commuting
Cons
- Occasional reports of reduced grip or lateral sliding during aggressive cornering in heavy rain
- Some complaints regarding premature tread wear and lack of manufacturer warranty support
- Subpar dry traction and wheel-spin reported by select Forester owners
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 B A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
Too close to call: Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 and Yokohama Geolandar G91AV are within 2 points overall. Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 is stronger on wet. Yokohama Geolandar G91AV is stronger on treadwear and dry. Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 scores 73 vs 68 on wet.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 73 vs 70 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar G91AV?
Which is better in the wet, Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar G91AV?
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5, 73 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar G91AV?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar G91AV?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology