Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 171 reviews
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV vs Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 171 + 24 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar G91AV is ahead, 70–51
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 24 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Geolandar G91AV +2647Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Ecopia EP422 Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 76 36 Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 75.9 = 73
Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 54.9 (est.) + 40% × 35.8 = 47
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
68
Wet
Geolandar G91AV +1553Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Ecopia EP422 Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 67 47 Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 68
Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 53
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Snow
Geolandar G91AV +1554Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Ecopia EP422 Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 68 43 Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 42.6 = 54
No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
71
Comfort
Geolandar G91AV +1754Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Ecopia EP422 Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 74 39 Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 71
Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 39.4 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G91AV or Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
Geolandar G91AV +1058Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Ecopia EP422 Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 70 45 Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 44.6 = 58
No road tests of noise for Geolandar G91AV or Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
Geolandar G91AV +1554Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Ecopia EP422 Plus Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 71 45 Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 69
Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 45.3 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
76
Handling (owners)
Geolandar G91AV +3640Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Ecopia EP422 Plus Reviews found online 76 40
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Geolandar G91AV | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 51 |
| Dry | 73 | 47 |
| Wet | 68 | 53 |
| Snow | 69 | 54 |
| Comfort | 71 | 54 |
| Noise | 68 | 58 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 40 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Geolandar G91AV
Ecopia EP422 Plus
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Geolandar G91AV
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on highways and city streets
- Reliable traction and confident handling in wet and dry conditions
- Good overall durability and tread longevity for daily commuting
Cons
- Occasional reports of reduced grip or lateral sliding during aggressive cornering in heavy rain
- Some complaints regarding premature tread wear and lack of manufacturer warranty support
- Subpar dry traction and wheel-spin reported by select Forester owners
Tire B Ecopia EP422 Plus
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality when new
- Predictable dry and wet traction for conservative daily commuting
Cons
- Significantly shorter tread life than advertised or expected
- Develops loud whining, buzzing, and increased noise as the tread wears down
- Stiff ride quality or harshness over rough pavement and cracks
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV | B · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 2 | 15 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 18″ | 15″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 B A | 640 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 76 vs 40 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 73 vs 47 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 71 vs 54 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 68 vs 53 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Geolandar G91AV or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Which is better in the wet, Geolandar G91AV or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 68 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Geolandar G91AV or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 73 vs 47 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Geolandar G91AV or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 69 vs 54 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Geolandar G91AV or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 68 vs 58 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Geolandar G91AV or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 71 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Geolandar G91AV or Ecopia EP422 Plus?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 69 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology