Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro AT2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 218 + 171 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar G91AV is ahead, 74–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 171 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
56
Dry
Geolandar G91AV +2076Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 50 81 Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.7 = 76
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
58
Wet
Geolandar G91AV +1472Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 54 72 Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 58
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 72
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Snow
Geolandar G91AV +1172Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 55 74 Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 61
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 72
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
52
Comfort
Geolandar G91AV +2375Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 45 79 Dynapro AT2: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 52
Geolandar G91AV: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 78.6 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 74 Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 70
No road tests of noise for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
55
Treadwear
Geolandar G91AV +1974Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 48 79 Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
47
Handling (owners)
Geolandar G91AV +3481Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Geolandar G91AV Reviews found online 47 81
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT2 | Yokohama Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 74 |
| Dry | 56 | 76 |
| Wet | 58 | 72 |
| Snow | 61 | 72 |
| Comfort | 52 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 47 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
56
/ 100
Dynapro AT2
74
/ 100
Geolandar G91AV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro AT2
Pros
- Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
- Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
- Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
- Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
- Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
Tire B Geolandar G91AV
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on highways and city streets
- Reliable traction and confident handling in wet and dry conditions
- Good overall durability and tread longevity for daily commuting
Cons
- Occasional reports of reduced grip or lateral sliding during aggressive cornering in heavy rain
- Some complaints regarding premature tread wear and lack of manufacturer warranty support
- Subpar dry traction and wheel-spin reported by select Forester owners
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Community sentiment for the Hankook Dynapro AT2 is divided, with frequent distinctions drawn between standard OEM versions and aftermarket or 'Xtreme' models. While drivers appreciate the tire's quiet highway ride, decent fuel economy, and competitive pricing, many criticize the base factory version for poor wet and winter traction as well as lack of genuine off-road capability. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for improved snow performance, durability, and aggressive styling.
f150gen14.com
·2 upvotes ·2025-10-21
“Factory tires are usually worse than what you normally purchase at a tire shop. Have seen it with every new vehicle. (I get a new work vehicle every 3-4 years) If you look up those Dynapro AT2s, you'll see they even have a different tread pattern for the ones that come with new F-150s vs what is reviewed/shown on Tirerack.com They are cheaper, made for mpg, and don't last. I replaced mine on my 2023 at 20K miles. We noticed the same thing on my wife's VW. Came with some lower-end goodyears that were replaced at 15K. Also, tread-wear warranty only applies to defects. If they wear out sooner, that generally isn't covered by any tire brand.”
f150lightningforum.com
·2025-03-08
“I’ve had the Hankook Dynapro AT2s on another truck and their Dynapro AS on my Expedition. Both were terrible, even dangerous. Got rid of them early on both vehicles. My Lightning came with the General Grabbers. The Grabbers are decent, actually handle snow and wet very well, but are worthless for slush and ice. They’re not good on dirt. But I’ve kept them on now for a bit over 2 years. I’ll be replacing them before next winter as it will be about time anyway. Definitely want to go with something a bit more aggressive or winter-capable, just not sure which tires as of yet. Can’t really afford to sacrifice any range… Maybe just a tiny bit is all.”
f150forum.com
“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”
Top themes
#poor wet traction#quiet highway ride#OEM vs aftermarket differences#AT2 Xtreme praise#snow and ice performance#fuel efficiency and treadwear#mild off-road capability
Based on 47 community posts
Tire B
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 33 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 17″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 440 - 660 A A - B | 280 B A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
56
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AT2
74
/ 100
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 81 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 75 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 76 vs 56 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 74 vs 55 on treadwear.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT2
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro AT2 or Geolandar G91AV?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro AT2 or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 72 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro AT2 or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 76 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro AT2 or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 72 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro AT2 or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 75 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro AT2 or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 74 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology