Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 3 reviews
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 3 + 35 owner reviews. How we score
Roadian H/TX RT5 leads, 70–67 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 35 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Geolandar H/T G056 +171Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 71 73 Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.4 = 71
No road tests of dry for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
73
Wet
Roadian H/TX RT5 +469Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 74 69 Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69
No road tests of wet for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Snow
Roadian H/TX RT5 +1158Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 68 51 Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 69
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 58
No road tests of snow for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
71
Comfort
Roadian H/TX RT5 +170Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 74 70 Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 71
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 73 Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 70
No road tests of noise for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Geolandar H/T G056 +266Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 62 66 Roadian H/TX RT5: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Roadian H/TX RT5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Roadian H/TX RT5 +269Why this score
Source Roadian H/TX RT5 Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online 71 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 67 |
| Dry | 70 | 71 |
| Wet | 73 | 69 |
| Snow | 69 | 58 |
| Comfort | 71 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Roadian H/TX RT5
Geolandar H/T G056
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Roadian H/TX RT5
Pros
- Strong initial traction in varied weather conditions including snow, slush, and ice
- Excellent performance for towing applications
- Impressive off-road capability, particularly in soft sand
Cons
- Noticeable decline in grip and handling characteristics after 8,000-10,000 miles
- Increased susceptibility to oversteer and instability on wet surfaces as tread wears
- Harsh ride quality and unpredictable handling at higher tire pressures
Tire B Geolandar H/T G056
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry pavement handling and stability
- Impressive tread longevity for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
- Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
- Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 | B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 56 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Narrow edge: Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 — better snow and wet. Where the Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 scores 69 vs 58 on snow.
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5 scores 73 vs 69 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Which is better in the wet, Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5, 73 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Nexen Roadian H/TX RT5, 69 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Roadian H/TX RT5 or Geolandar H/T G056?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology