Head-to-head Updated

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 9 + 18 road tests and 61 + 23 owner reviews. How we score

Winter i cept evo3 is ahead, 78–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
Tire ANexen

WinGuard Sport 2

Winter

± 5

Tests 73 · 9 tests Owners 71 · 61 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test (noise)

Hankook Winter i cept evo3
± 4

Tests 76 · 18 tests Owners 82 · 23 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 3 tests that measured wet braking for both, WinGuard Sport 2 won 0 and Winter i cept evo3 won 3 (average 84% vs 94% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured snow braking for both, WinGuard Sport 2 won 0 and Winter i cept evo3 won 3 (average 94% vs 97% of the best).
  1. 70

    Dry

    Winter i cept evo3 +8
    78
    Why this score
    SourceWinGuard Sport 2Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 13 tests7175
    Reviews found online6983
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–194%94%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%98%

    WinGuard Sport 2: 60% × 70.8 + 40% × 69.4 = 70

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 82.6 = 78

  2. 75

    Wet

    Winter i cept evo3 +15
    90
    Why this score
    SourceWinGuard Sport 2Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 18 tests7392
    Reviews found online7786
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%100%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–384%94%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%99%

    WinGuard Sport 2: 60% × 73.5 + 40% × 77.3 = 75

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 91.8 + 40% × 86.3 = 90

  3. 70

    Snow

    Winter i cept evo3 +10
    80
    Why this score
    SourceWinGuard Sport 2Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 18 tests7081
    Reviews found online7080
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–394%97%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–192%100%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–187%94%

    WinGuard Sport 2: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 80.3 = 80

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Winter i cept evo3 +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceWinGuard Sport 2Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests6472
    Reviews found online7074

    WinGuard Sport 2: 40% × 64.4 + 60% × 70.4 = 68

    Winter i cept evo3: 40% × 71.7 + 60% × 73.9 = 73

  5. 80

    Noise

    WinGuard Sport 2 +47
    33
    Why this score
    SourceWinGuard Sport 2Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 13 tests9310
    Reviews found online61≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%97%

    WinGuard Sport 2: 60% × 93.3 + 40% × 61.1 = 80

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 10 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 33

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Winter i cept evo3 +6
    79
    Why this score
    SourceWinGuard Sport 2Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests7577
    Reviews found online7181

    WinGuard Sport 2: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 71.3 = 73

    Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 77 + 40% × 81 = 79

  7. 70

    Handling (owners)

    Winter i cept evo3 +11
    81
    Why this score
    SourceWinGuard Sport 2Winter i cept evo3
    Reviews found online7081
  8. 34

    Efficiency

    Winter i cept evo3 +27
    61
    Why this score
    SourceWinGuard Sport 2Winter i cept evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 13 tests3461
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–190%91%
Scores at a glance
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen WinGuard Sport 2Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Relative Score 72 78
Dry 70 78
Wet 75 90
Snow 70 80
Comfort 68 73
Noise 80 33
Treadwear 73 79
Handling (owners) 70 81
Efficiency 34 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

WinGuard Sport 2

± 4

Winter i cept evo3

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 finished ahead 0 times and Hankook Winter i cept evo3 3 times.

DisciplineCategoryWinGuard Sport 2Winter i cept evo3ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 94% 94% −0.6 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Dry Handling Dry 99% 98% +0.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 100% −2.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Wet Braking Wet 84% 94% −9.8 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test · 225/45 R18
Wet Handling Wet 97% 99% −1.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Snow Braking Snow 94% 97% −2.6 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test · 225/45 R18
Snow Handling Snow 92% 100% −7.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Snow Traction Snow 87% 94% −7.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Noise Noise 100% 97% +3.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 90% 91% −1.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 100% 87% +13.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #27/54 #8/54 – 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test · 225/45 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A WinGuard Sport 2

Pros

  • Excellent value and affordable price point compared to premium winter tires
  • Low noise levels and high comfort, often rivaling all-season or summer tires
  • Strong grip and stability on cold dry and wet pavement

Cons

  • Subpar performance on hard-packed ice and deep snow compared to dedicated heavy-duty winter tires
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to slightly vague handling or a 'rolly' feeling in hard cornering
  • Reports of higher rolling resistance resulting in a minor drop in fuel economy
All owner themes in the WinGuard Sport 2 review

Tire B Winter i cept evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and outstanding aquaplaning resistance
  • Outstanding snow and ice traction providing high confidence in winter storms
  • Great value for money compared to Tier-1 brands like Michelin or Goodyear

Cons

  • Slightly increased noise levels or humming compared to summer tires
  • Mixed feedback on ride comfort, with some finding them stiffer
  • Longer braking distances reported by a few users in specific conditions
All owner themes in the Winter i cept evo3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available8086
Rim diameters15″ – 20″17″ – 22″
Tread depth11/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common4141

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — better efficiency, wet and handling. Pick the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 scores 80 vs 33 on noise.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 61 vs 34 on efficiency.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 90 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 81 vs 70 on handling.

Tire A · Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
Tire B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

WinGuard Sport 2 or Winter i cept evo3?

Which is better in the wet, WinGuard Sport 2 or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 90 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, WinGuard Sport 2 or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 78 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, WinGuard Sport 2 or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 80 vs 70 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, WinGuard Sport 2 or Winter i cept evo3?

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2, 80 vs 33 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, WinGuard Sport 2 or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 73 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, WinGuard Sport 2 or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 79 vs 73 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, WinGuard Sport 2 or Winter i cept evo3?

Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 61 vs 34 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology