tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 18 + 373 owner reviews. How we score

Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV is ahead, 75–68

Check price on Amazon · Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV or Grabber A/TX on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
Tire ANokian

Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

Winter

± 6

Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 80 · 18 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

General Grabber A/TX
Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta R5 SUVGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests74≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7468

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 74.3 = 74

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta R5 SUVGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests69≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online8474

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 68.6 + 40% × 83.5 = 75

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 79

    Snow

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +11
    68
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta R5 SUVGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests75≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8567

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 84.7 = 79

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +15
    61
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta R5 SUVGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7958

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 79.1 = 76

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 58.1 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 73

    Noise

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta R5 SUVGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests66≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online8460

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 65.7 + 40% × 83.5 = 73

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 74

    Treadwear

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta R5 SUVGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7872

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 74

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV +20
    59
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta R5 SUVGrabber A/TX
    Reviews found online7959
  8. 72

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceHakkapeliitta R5 SUVGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests72–
Scores at a glance
CategoryNokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUVGeneral Grabber A/TX
Relative Score 75 68
Dry 74 68
Wet 75 73
Snow 79 68
Comfort 76 61
Noise 73 64
Treadwear 74 70
Handling (owners) 79 59
Efficiency 72 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

± 7

Grabber A/TX

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction on snow and ice
  • Significantly quieter than previous models and studded alternatives
  • Stable and predictable handling with a firm, confident ride on dry and wet pavement

Cons

  • Higher price point compared to some other tire options
  • Slightly firmer ride compared to softer alternatives like Bridgestone Blizzaks
  • Some minor compromises in ultimate dry and wet grip typical of soft-compound winter tires
All owner themes in the Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV review

Tire B Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

r/f150 ·14 upvotes ·2021-09-13

“Thoughts on the “General Grabber A/TX” Tire? I’m thinking about getting it in a 33” SL rated 275/70r18. This tire comes in at 46Lbs which is super light. $915ish for 4! It’s the only 33”, snow rated, All Terrain, C/SL load range I could find. All the other 33”s are E rated coming in around 60lbs.”
ram-trx.com ·3 upvotes ·2025-01-03

“We finally go out first snow storm of winter. We have 8” of fresh snow on the ground, and below that a half an inch of ice (it rained first then snowed). Initial impressions of the General Grabber A/Tx is good. Way quieter than stock tires on the highway, and good traction on snow and ice.”
5thgenrams.com ·2019-12-14

“Not sure where those ratings are from but all the ratings I have seen on the tire have been on par with other at tires. all 4 cost me 765 installed. My traction in NEPA has been excellent in the snow and wet.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV B · General Grabber A/TX
CategoryWinterAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available7044
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Tread depth12/32″14 - 17/32″
UTQG—640 A A - B
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure47 - 51 psi35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

General Grabber A/TX

Winner: Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV — better handling, comfort and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 79 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 76 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 79 vs 68 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV scores 73 vs 64 on noise.

Tire A · Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber A/TX
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV or Grabber A/TX?

Which is better in the wet, Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV or Grabber A/TX?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 74 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV or Grabber A/TX?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 79 vs 68 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV or Grabber A/TX?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 73 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV or Grabber A/TX?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 76 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV or Grabber A/TX?

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV, 74 vs 70 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology