Tests 67 · 10 tests Owners 81 · 66 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test (dry braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 10 + 16 road tests and 66 + 22 owner reviews. How we score
Winter i cept evo3 is ahead, 78–73
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 10 tests Owners 81 · 66 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test (dry braking)
Tests 76 · 16 tests Owners 82 · 22 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 12 tests | 73 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 82 | 82 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 96% | 95% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 99% | 100% |
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 82.3 = 77
Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 82.2 = 78
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 16 tests | 81 | 93 |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 86 |
| Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 94% | 97% |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 86% | 94% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 95% | 98% |
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 80.7 + 40% × 87.4 = 83
Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 92.6 + 40% × 86.4 = 90
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / 16 tests | 57 | 80 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 80 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 | 94% | 97% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 97% | 98% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 91% | 93% |
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 56.8 + 40% × 79.2 = 66
Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 80 + 40% × 80.1 = 80
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 72 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 74 |
Winter Sottozero 3: 40% × 72.3 + 60% × 75.9 = 74
Winter i cept evo3: 40% × 70.2 + 60% × 73.9 = 72
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 12 tests | 65 | 10 |
| Reviews found online | 82 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 97% | 94% |
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 64.6 + 40% × 81.9 = 72
Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 10 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 33
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 4 tests | 56 | 77 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 81 |
| Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0 | 83% | 83% |
Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 56.2 + 40% × 74.6 = 64
Winter i cept evo3: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 80.7 = 78
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 83 | 81 |
| Source | Winter Sottozero 3 | Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 12 tests | 76 | 67 |
| Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 81% |
| Category | Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | Hankook Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 78 |
| Dry | 77 | 78 |
| Wet | 83 | 90 |
| Snow | 66 | 80 |
| Comfort | 74 | 72 |
| Noise | 72 | 33 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 78 |
| Handling (owners) | 83 | 81 |
| Efficiency | 76 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Winter Sottozero 3
Winter i cept evo3
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 finished ahead 0 times and Hankook Winter i cept evo3 2 times.
| Discipline | Category | Winter Sottozero 3 | Winter i cept evo3 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% | 95% | +0.5 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% | 100% | −0.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% | 97% | −2.8 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 86% | 94% | −7.7 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% | 98% | −3.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 94% | 97% | −3.0 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 97% | 98% | −0.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 91% | 93% | −2.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 90% #2/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 91% #13/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 97% | 94% | +3.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 83% | 83% | 0.0 | 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% | 81% | +19.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 54% #8/11 · 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test | 90% #3/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #5/20 | #18/20 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Value | Cost | 64% | 78% | −13.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test · 245/45 R18 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #20/48 | #5/48 | – | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test · 245/45 R18 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 | B · Hankook Winter i cept evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 98 | 86 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 57 | 57 |
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo3 — better snow, treadwear and wet. Pick the Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 if noise and efficiency matter most to you.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 72 vs 33 on noise.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 80 vs 66 on snow.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 scores 78 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 76 vs 67 on efficiency.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 90 vs 83 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 78 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 80 vs 66 on our snow score.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 72 vs 33 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Hankook Winter i cept evo3, 78 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 76 vs 67 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology