Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Riken Raptor HR vs Yokohama Geolandar G91A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 22 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison37Why this score
Source Raptor HR Geolandar G91A Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 49 (est.) Reviews found online – 21 Geolandar G91A: 60% × 48.7 (est.) + 40% × 20.5 = 37
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
–
Wet
No comparison32Why this score
Source Raptor HR Geolandar G91A Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 41 (est.) Reviews found online – 19 Geolandar G91A: 60% × 41.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.9 = 32
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison48Why this score
Source Raptor HR Geolandar G91A Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online – 33 Geolandar G91A: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 32.5 = 48
No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
–
Comfort
No comparison41Why this score
Source Raptor HR Geolandar G91A Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online – 14 Geolandar G91A: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 14.1 = 41
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison52Why this score
Source Raptor HR Geolandar G91A Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 29 Geolandar G91A: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 29 = 52
No road tests of noise for Geolandar G91A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison39Why this score
Source Raptor HR Geolandar G91A Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online – 20 Geolandar G91A: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 20.1 = 39
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison23Why this score
Source Raptor HR Geolandar G91A Reviews found online – 23
Scores at a glance
| Category | Riken Raptor HR | Yokohama Geolandar G91A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 38 |
| Dry | – | 37 |
| Wet | – | 32 |
| Snow | – | 48 |
| Comfort | – | 41 |
| Noise | – | 52 |
| Treadwear | – | 39 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 23 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Raptor HR
Geolandar G91A
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Riken Raptor HR | B · Yokohama Geolandar G91A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Grand Touring All-Season | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 B A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Riken Raptor HR
Yokohama Geolandar G91A
Only Yokohama Geolandar G91A has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology