Tests 67 · 2 tests Owners 63 · 10 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 6 in 2025 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test (noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons vs Kumho Solus 4S HA32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 5 road tests and 10 + 4,307 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Atrezzo 4 Seasons and Solus 4S HA32 are level at 65.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 5 tests Owners 57 · 4,307 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wear)
“They have been great so far. Unfortunately, only minor snow storms since they were installed but so far so good . Very quiet and predictable handling.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Atrezzo 4 Seasons +461Why this score
Source Atrezzo 4 Seasons Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 5 tests 68 67 Reviews found online 60 52 Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 91% 90% Atrezzo 4 Seasons: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 59.8 = 65
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 52.3 = 61
-
68
Wet
Solus 4S HA32 +270Why this score
Source Atrezzo 4 Seasons Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 5 tests 72 77 Reviews found online 63 60 Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 85% 91% Atrezzo 4 Seasons: 60% × 72 + 40% × 63 = 68
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 60.4 = 70
-
56
Snow
Solus 4S HA32 +1167Why this score
Source Atrezzo 4 Seasons Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 52 71 Reviews found online 62 61 Atrezzo 4 Seasons: 60% × 51.8 + 40% × 62 = 56
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 71 + 40% × 60.7 = 67
-
66
Comfort
Atrezzo 4 Seasons +660Why this score
Source Atrezzo 4 Seasons Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 65 56 Atrezzo 4 Seasons: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 64.6 = 66
Solus 4S HA32: 40% × 66.1 (est.) + 60% × 56 = 60
No road tests of comfort for Atrezzo 4 Seasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Solus 4S HA32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
73
Noise
Atrezzo 4 Seasons +271Why this score
Source Atrezzo 4 Seasons Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 77 74 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Atrezzo 4 Seasons: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 73
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of noise for Atrezzo 4 Seasons or Solus 4S HA32. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
68
Treadwear
Atrezzo 4 Seasons +365Why this score
Source Atrezzo 4 Seasons Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 68 57 Atrezzo 4 Seasons: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68
Solus 4S HA32: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 56.7 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Atrezzo 4 Seasons. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Atrezzo 4 Seasons +1052Why this score
Source Atrezzo 4 Seasons Solus 4S HA32 Reviews found online 62 52 -
44
Efficiency
Solus 4S HA32 +1054Why this score
Source Atrezzo 4 Seasons Solus 4S HA32 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 44 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons | Kumho Solus 4S HA32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 65 |
| Dry | 65 | 61 |
| Wet | 68 | 70 |
| Snow | 56 | 67 |
| Comfort | 66 | 60 |
| Noise | 73 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 52 |
| Efficiency | 44 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Atrezzo 4 Seasons
65
/ 100
Solus 4S HA32
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons finished ahead 0 times and Kumho Solus 4S HA32 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Atrezzo 4 Seasons | Solus 4S HA32 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% | 90% | +1.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 All Season Tyre Market Overview - 32 Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/6 · 2025 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test | 99% #8/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% #5/6 · 2025 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test | 95% #13/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 85% | 91% | −5.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 All Season Tyre Market Overview - 32 Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #6/6 · 2025 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test | 92% #14/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 96% #6/6 · 2025 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test | 97% #11/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 82% #6/6 · 2025 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test | 88% #13/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #1/6 · 2025 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test | 99% #7/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 76% #6/6 · 2025 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test | 87% #8/16 · 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #20/31 | #10/31 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 All Season Tyre Market Overview - 32 Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Atrezzo 4 Seasons
Pros
- Exceptional value for money and affordable purchase price
- Low noise levels and quiet, comfortable ride quality
- Good grip and stopping distances on dry and wet surfaces
Cons
- Tendency to slide or feel unstable under heavy braking as the tires age
- Noticeable drop in wet grip and cornering stability after 3-4 years of use
- Confusing rolling resistance labeling on certain variants
Tire B Solus 4S HA32
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium alternatives
- Good grip and confidence-inspiring performance in wet and winter conditions
- Comfortable ride quality that effectively absorbs road imperfections and potholes
Cons
- Some users reported faster-than-expected tread wear or peeling
- Road noise can increase or become prominent in hot weather or as the tires age
- Dry cornering and high-temperature performance lack the sharpness of dedicated summer tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Solus 4S HA32
Community opinion is split. Some owners praise the tire as quiet, predictable, good in winter, and a cheaper alternative to the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Others report fast or uneven wear, with lifespans of about 24k to 60k miles and some premature wear cases, and say the tire is lower-tier compared with premium all-weather options. Most posts are shoppers asking for opinions, and the tire is often chosen for its low price and 3PMSF rating.
teslamotorsclub.com
·1 upvote ·2024-08-22
“We're now 18 months later, and my Kumho Solus 4S HA32 235/45 R18 W (98) are ready to be replaced (a bit more life in the fronts, but the rears certainly - this is a RWD only Model 3 SR+ on 18" rims). The car is now at 48.5k miles, so it looks like I got about 24k miles out of them in that year-and-half. Sadly those exact Kumho tyres don't seem to be available anymore, and the alternative which comes up is Kumho Solus 4S HA32 235/45 R18 Y (98) which has a worse fuel efficiency (only C, rather than B rated). So while they are competitively priced (little changed), I'm looking at other brands.”
r/tires
·9 upvotes ·2024-11-15
“Kumho HA32 fast wear Hey all, would just like to share my experience with the solus ha32 4 season by kumho. These tires were installed at 173,000km last September and currently have 188,000km… around 15,000km give or take 10,000 miles in all types of weather. They are nearing end of life already.. thoughts? Overall they do ok in the snow but arent amazing. Noise isnt horrible, but the wear holy man this is crazy. I had the front suspension replaced as well as an alignment on the day of tire installation. Read more”
r/MINI
·3 upvotes ·2026-11-04
“If you want a budget tire that’s great for winter, I’ve had great experience with the Kumho SOLUS 4S HA32 it’s a direct competitor to the Michelin CrossClimate 2 but it’s usually $ 50 to $ 80 less per tire.”
Top themes
#Fast tread wear#Budget all-weather option#Winter snow performance#Quiet predictable handling#CrossClimate 2 comparison#3PMSF rating#Uneven edge wear#Limited long-term data
Based on 30 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons | B · Kumho Solus 4S HA32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 31 | 106 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 17″ | 13″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 29 | 29 |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons
65
/ 100
Kumho Solus 4S HA32
Too close to call: Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons and Kumho Solus 4S HA32 are within 2 points overall. Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons is stronger on handling, comfort and dry. Kumho Solus 4S HA32 is stronger on snow and efficiency.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 scores 67 vs 56 on snow.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons scores 62 vs 52 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Kumho Solus 4S HA32 scores 54 vs 44 on efficiency.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons scores 66 vs 60 on comfort.
Tire A · Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons
Tire B · Kumho Solus 4S HA32
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Atrezzo 4 Seasons or Solus 4S HA32?
Which is better in the wet, Atrezzo 4 Seasons or Solus 4S HA32?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Atrezzo 4 Seasons or Solus 4S HA32?
Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons, 65 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Atrezzo 4 Seasons or Solus 4S HA32?
Kumho Solus 4S HA32, 67 vs 56 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Atrezzo 4 Seasons or Solus 4S HA32?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 71 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Atrezzo 4 Seasons or Solus 4S HA32?
Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons, 66 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Atrezzo 4 Seasons or Solus 4S HA32?
Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Atrezzo 4 Seasons or Solus 4S HA32?
Kumho Solus 4S HA32, 54 vs 44 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology