Toyo 330 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Toyo 330 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 5 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 70–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo 330
Tire AToyo

330

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 5 reviews

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 58 · 2,189 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +13
    74
    Why this score
    Source330ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 63 (est.)77
    Reviews found online5769

    330: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 61

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 68.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for 330. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 52

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +16
    68
    Why this score
    Source330ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 56 (est.)70
    Reviews found online4565

    330: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 45.2 = 52

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 65.2 = 68

    No road tests of wet for 330. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    34
    Why this score
    Source330ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 50 (est.)
    Reviews found online–10

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 10.4 = 34

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    330 +2
    63
    Why this score
    Source330ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)62
    Reviews found online6163

    330: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 65

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 63.3 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for 330. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    Source330ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–75
    Reviews found online–62

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 61.8 = 70

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +5
    69
    Why this score
    Source330ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 65 (est.)74
    Reviews found online6361

    330: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 64

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 60.8 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for 330. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 57

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +14
    71
    Why this score
    Source330ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online5771
Scores at a glance
Toyo 330 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo 330Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 59 70
Dry 61 74
Wet 52 68
Snow – 34
Comfort 65 63
Noise – 70
Treadwear 64 69
Handling (owners) 57 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

330

ADVAN Fleva V701

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A 330

Pros

  • Good dry weather grip and feedback
  • Quiet operation and comfortable ride quality
  • Reasonable price point for budget-conscious buyers

Cons

  • Extremely poor wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
  • Unpredictable handling in rain leading to loss of vehicle control
  • Inconsistent safety reputation compared to modern tire standards
All owner themes in the 330 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Toyo 330

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Neutral

Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.

Top themes
#daily driving suitability#treadwear and lifespan#budget summer performance#comparison to Michelin#steering feel and turn-in#wheel sizing availability

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo 330 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—70
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo 330

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better wet, handling and dry. Where the Toyo 330 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Toyo 330 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 68 vs 52 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.

Tire A · Toyo 330
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

330 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, 330 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 68 vs 52 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, 330 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, 330 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 63 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, 330 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology