Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 5 reviews
Toyo NanoEnergy 2 vs Toyo Proxes CF2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 5 + 111 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes CF2 is ahead, 74–53
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 69 · 1 test Owners 79 · 111 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
54
Dry
Proxes CF2 +1872Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 2 Proxes CF2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 47 79 NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.8 = 54
Proxes CF2: 60% × 66.9 + 40% × 79.3 = 72
No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
51
Wet
Proxes CF2 +2475Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 2 Proxes CF2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 44 81 NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 56.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.2 = 51
Proxes CF2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 81 = 75
No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
54
Comfort
Proxes CF2 +2175Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 2 Proxes CF2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 46 78 NanoEnergy 2: 40% × 64.2 (est.) + 60% × 46.4 = 54
Proxes CF2: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 78.2 = 75
No road tests of comfort for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Proxes CF2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
57
Treadwear
Proxes CF2 +1673Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 2 Proxes CF2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 51 77 NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 57
Proxes CF2: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
47
Handling (owners)
Proxes CF2 +3481Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 2 Proxes CF2 Reviews found online 47 81
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo NanoEnergy 2 | Toyo Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 74 |
| Dry | 54 | 72 |
| Wet | 51 | 75 |
| Comfort | 54 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 47 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
NanoEnergy 2
Proxes CF2
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | NanoEnergy 2 | Proxes CF2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #50/50 2016 Market Overview - Braking Test | #8/16 2019 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A NanoEnergy 2
Pros
- High level of ride comfort
- Satisfactory dry-road grip for casual driving
- Low noise levels
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
- Tendency to squeal during cornering
- Inconsistent handling compared to premium factory-fitted alternatives
Tire B Proxes CF2
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong wet and dry grip with predictable handling
Cons
- Reports of rubber hardening or cracking after 2-3 years in hot climates
- Soft sidewalls can feel less precise during aggressive cornering
- Requires a significant 'scrub-in' period to reach peak grip levels
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo NanoEnergy 2 | B · Toyo Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 55 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo NanoEnergy 2
Toyo Proxes CF2
Winner: Toyo Proxes CF2 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo NanoEnergy 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 81 vs 47 on handling.
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 75 vs 51 on wet.
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 75 vs 54 on comfort.
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 72 vs 54 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
NanoEnergy 2 or Proxes CF2?
Which is better in the wet, NanoEnergy 2 or Proxes CF2?
Toyo Proxes CF2, 75 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, NanoEnergy 2 or Proxes CF2?
Toyo Proxes CF2, 72 vs 54 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, NanoEnergy 2 or Proxes CF2?
Toyo Proxes CF2, 75 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, NanoEnergy 2 or Proxes CF2?
Toyo Proxes CF2, 73 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology