Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 900 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (comfort (tester's mark))
“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 900 + 110 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes CF2 is ahead, 75–64
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 900 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (comfort (tester's mark))
“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”
Tests 69 · 1 test Owners 80 · 110 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 53 | 67 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 81 |
Proxes TR1: 60% × 52.9 + 40% × 69.8 = 60
Proxes CF2: 60% × 67 + 40% × 80.9 = 73
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 66 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 81 |
Proxes TR1: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 69.6 = 68
Proxes CF2: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 81.2 = 75
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 68 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 79 |
Proxes TR1: 40% × 68.2 + 60% × 59.6 = 63
Proxes CF2: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 78.7 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Proxes CF2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 68 | – |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | – |
Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 68
No owner ratings of noise for Proxes TR1. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 78 |
Proxes TR1: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 62
Proxes CF2: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TR1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 81 |
| Source | Proxes TR1 | Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 71 | – |
| Category | Toyo Proxes TR1 | Toyo Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 75 |
| Dry | 60 | 73 |
| Wet | 68 | 75 |
| Comfort | 63 | 76 |
| Noise | 68 | – |
| Treadwear | 62 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 81 |
| Efficiency | 71 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Proxes TR1
Proxes CF2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Proxes TR1 | Proxes CF2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 87% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 97% #10/10 · 2017 Mid Range Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 96% #6/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 99% #7/10 · 2017 Mid Range Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 82% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 91% #6/10 · 2017 Mid Range Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #5/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | 96% #6/10 · 2017 Mid Range Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/6 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | #8/16 2019 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Toyo Proxes TR1 is mixed, with users frequently noting an attractive price point and smooth, comfortable ride when compared to factory tires or run-flats. However, multiple drivers report shortcomings in wet-weather performance, cold grip, and road noise as mileage increases, while several criticize its soft sidewalls for creating imprecise handling at the limit.
“I had these exact tyres on my ep3, and they were brilliant compared what the car came with from factory. I can’t remember what they were, but for me , they just didn’t feel right…when I went t for these TR1’s , it felt like cars dynamics completely changed for the better. But my driving was mainly city/motorways and sometimes b-roads. And now I’m reminiscing about my type-r days…”
“Quote: Originally Posted by gamisou 70l46 did you get yours mounted and balanced for that price? I picked mine up at tiredealsforless.com for $765.12 shipped. They had the best prices that I have seen. Yep, $859 is mounted/balanced and 6% Michigan sales tax. Got them from Tireman, a Ohio/Michigan tire retailer & service center.”
“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”
Based on 36 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes TR1 | B · Toyo Proxes CF2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 61 | 55 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 20″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 23 | 23 |
Toyo Proxes TR1
Toyo Proxes CF2
Winner: Toyo Proxes CF2 — better dry, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 73 vs 60 on dry.
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 76 vs 63 on comfort.
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 73 vs 62 on treadwear.
Toyo Proxes CF2 scores 81 vs 72 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Toyo Proxes CF2, 75 vs 68 on our wet score.
Toyo Proxes CF2, 73 vs 60 on our dry score.
Toyo Proxes CF2, 76 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Toyo Proxes CF2, 73 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology