Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 1,120 reviews
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 vs Toyo Proxes TR1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 1,120 + 903 owner reviews. How we score
NanoEnergy 3 is ahead, 69–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 903 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (comfort (tester's mark))
“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
NanoEnergy 3 +1059Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 53 Reviews found online 70 69 NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69
Proxes TR1: 60% × 52.8 + 40% × 69.3 = 59
No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
68
Wet
Level68Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 66 70 NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68
Proxes TR1: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
NanoEnergy 3 +663Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 70 59 NanoEnergy 3: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69
Proxes TR1: 40% × 68.1 + 60% × 59.1 = 63
No road tests of comfort for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison68Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 68 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 68
No owner ratings of noise for Proxes TR1. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
71
Treadwear
NanoEnergy 3 +863Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 73 60 NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71
Proxes TR1: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TR1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
70
Handling (owners)
Proxes TR1 +272Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 Proxes TR1 Reviews found online 70 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 Proxes TR1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo NanoEnergy 3 | Toyo Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 64 |
| Dry | 69 | 59 |
| Wet | 68 | 68 |
| Comfort | 69 | 63 |
| Noise | – | 68 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
NanoEnergy 3
Proxes TR1
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A NanoEnergy 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
- Great value for money and affordable pricing
- Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate
Cons
- Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
- Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
- Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
Tire B Proxes TR1
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and responsive steering feedback
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier-one brands
- Attractive and aggressive directional tread design
Cons
- Noticeable road noise and humming sounds at certain speeds
- Soft sidewalls that can cause a slight squirm or delayed initial steering response
- Rapid tread wear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear axles
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Toyo NanoEnergy 3
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Toyo Proxes TR1
Community sentiment regarding the Toyo Proxes TR1 is mixed, with users frequently noting an attractive price point and smooth, comfortable ride when compared to factory tires or run-flats. However, multiple drivers report shortcomings in wet-weather performance, cold grip, and road noise as mileage increases, while several criticize its soft sidewalls for creating imprecise handling at the limit.
“Bekomme ich mit unterschiedliche Reifen Modelle Probleme mit dem Verteiler Getriebe? Hallo, ich habe mal eine Frage bezüglich Reifen und dem Verteilergetriebe. Ich habe vor ein paar Jahren einen gebrauchten Felgensatz gekauft auf dem Reifen aus dem Jahr 2016 waren Profiltiefe der Reifen war bei allen neuwertig. Anfang diesen Jahres habe ich mir dann hinten links einen Platten gefahren. Ich habe dann die Reifen hinten achsweise getauscht mit dem selben Reifen was verbaut war (neue toyo proxes tr1 Reifen. Unglücklicherweise habe ich jetzt wieder einen platten Reifen, allerdings vorne. Nun wollte ich wieder 2 neue Reifen für vorne bestellen (ebenfalls toyo proxes tr1). Leider läuft dieses Modell wohl aus und sind nicht mehr verfügbar. Meine Frage jetzt, kann ich andere Reifen Modelle nutzen (toyo comfort in den selben Maßen wie den Proxes tr1) oder sind diese problematisch? Vielen Dank im Voraus 🙂 Read more”
“I had asymmetric 2 or possibly 3's on an impreza and they were a fantastic all rounder. The 5's will be going on my daily when i find a good deal!”
“70l46 did you get yours mounted and balanced for that price? I picked mine up at tiredealsforless.com for $765.12 shipped. They had the best prices that I have seen.”
Based on 36 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo NanoEnergy 3 | B · Toyo Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 48 | 61 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 17″ | 14″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 14 | 14 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Toyo Proxes TR1
Winner: Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — better dry, treadwear and comfort. Where the Toyo Proxes TR1 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 69 vs 59 on dry.
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 71 vs 63 on treadwear.
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 69 vs 63 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
NanoEnergy 3 or Proxes TR1?
Which is better in the wet, NanoEnergy 3 or Proxes TR1?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, NanoEnergy 3 or Proxes TR1?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 69 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, NanoEnergy 3 or Proxes TR1?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 69 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, NanoEnergy 3 or Proxes TR1?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 71 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology