Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 8 reviews
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 vs Yokohama Advan dB V552 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 37 owner reviews. How we score
NanoEnergy R38 is ahead, 70–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 37 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
NanoEnergy R38 +1061Why this score
Source NanoEnergy R38 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 72 57 NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71
Advan dB V552: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 61
No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
NanoEnergy R38 +864Why this score
Source NanoEnergy R38 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 73 61 NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72
Advan dB V552: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64
No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Comfort
NanoEnergy R38 +168Why this score
Source NanoEnergy R38 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 69 67 NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69
Advan dB V552: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 68
No road tests of comfort for NanoEnergy R38 or Advan dB V552. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
NanoEnergy R38 +560Why this score
Source NanoEnergy R38 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 65 56 NanoEnergy R38: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
Advan dB V552: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy R38. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
NanoEnergy R38 +1160Why this score
Source NanoEnergy R38 Advan dB V552 Reviews found online 71 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo NanoEnergy R38 | Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 62 |
| Dry | 71 | 61 |
| Wet | 72 | 64 |
| Comfort | 69 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
NanoEnergy R38
Advan dB V552
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A NanoEnergy R38
Pros
- Reliable wet and dry grip with predictable handling limits
- Good value for money compared to premium brand alternatives
- Solid longevity and mileage, with respectable tread wear reported
Cons
- Slightly increased road noise reported by some users
- Limited size or availability challenges noted by consumers wanting replacements
Tire B Advan dB V552
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and silent operation at various speeds
- High level of ride comfort, effectively absorbing bumps and potholes
- Good grip and sure-footed performance in wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can cause a floating sensation or lack of sharpness at higher speeds
- Reduced dry cornering grip when pushed hard, with some tendency to wash out
- Mixed feedback on overall durability, with a few users experiencing faster-than-expected wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo NanoEnergy R38 | B · Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 45 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo NanoEnergy R38
Yokohama Advan dB V552
Winner: Toyo NanoEnergy R38 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo NanoEnergy R38 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 71 vs 60 on handling.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 71 vs 61 on dry.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 72 vs 64 on wet.
Toyo NanoEnergy R38 scores 65 vs 60 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
NanoEnergy R38 or Advan dB V552?
Which is better in the wet, NanoEnergy R38 or Advan dB V552?
Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 72 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, NanoEnergy R38 or Advan dB V552?
Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 71 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, NanoEnergy R38 or Advan dB V552?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, NanoEnergy R38 or Advan dB V552?
Toyo NanoEnergy R38, 65 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology