Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 38 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Toyo Proxes C1S vs Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 38 + 1,120 owner reviews. How we score
NanoEnergy 3 is ahead, 69–59
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 1,120 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
NanoEnergy 3 +969Why this score
Source Proxes C1S NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 56 70 Proxes C1S: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60
NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.7 = 69
No road tests of dry for Proxes C1S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
62
Wet
NanoEnergy 3 +668Why this score
Source Proxes C1S NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 66 Proxes C1S: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 62
NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68
No road tests of wet for Proxes C1S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
59
Comfort
NanoEnergy 3 +1170Why this score
Source Proxes C1S NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 54 70 Proxes C1S: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 53.8 = 59
NanoEnergy 3: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 70.3 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Proxes C1S or NanoEnergy 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
NanoEnergy 3 +1571Why this score
Source Proxes C1S NanoEnergy 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 50 73 Proxes C1S: 60% × 60.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.9 = 56
NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes C1S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
56
Handling (owners)
NanoEnergy 3 +1470Why this score
Source Proxes C1S NanoEnergy 3 Reviews found online 56 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes C1S | Toyo NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 69 |
| Dry | 60 | 69 |
| Wet | 62 | 68 |
| Comfort | 59 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 56 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
59
/ 100
Proxes C1S
69
/ 100
NanoEnergy 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Proxes C1S
Pros
- High levels of comfort and ride quality when new
- Strong initial dry grip and stability at high speeds
- Effective puncture resistance and reinforced sidewall construction
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Rapid tread wear and premature degradation
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
Tire B NanoEnergy 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
- Great value for money and affordable pricing
- Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate
Cons
- Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
- Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
- Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes C1S | B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 13 | 48 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 13″ – 17″ |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
59
/ 100
Toyo Proxes C1S
69
/ 100
Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Winner: Toyo NanoEnergy 3 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 71 vs 56 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 70 vs 56 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 70 vs 59 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 69 vs 60 on dry.
Tire A · Toyo Proxes C1S
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy 3
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Proxes C1S or NanoEnergy 3?
Which is better in the wet, Proxes C1S or NanoEnergy 3?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 68 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes C1S or NanoEnergy 3?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 69 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Proxes C1S or NanoEnergy 3?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 70 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Proxes C1S or NanoEnergy 3?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 71 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology