Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews
Toyo Proxes CF1 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 46 + 2,504 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 77–69
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 13 tests Owners 71 · 2,504 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +1080Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 72 73 Proxes CF1: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 70
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 73.4 = 80
No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +578Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 74 75 Proxes CF1: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 73
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 74.6 = 78
No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
Level69Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 69 68 Proxes CF1: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.3 = 69
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.8 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison61Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 58 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
62
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +1274Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 59 67 Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 66.7 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Ventus Prime 4 +372Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 69 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison83Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes CF1 | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 77 |
| Dry | 70 | 80 |
| Wet | 73 | 78 |
| Comfort | 69 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Proxes CF1
Ventus Prime 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Proxes CF1
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
- Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Toyo Proxes CF1
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
“Ya. I read that review too. If I up the psi to 3, or 4 would result in hard and harsh bumps and much less comfy ride which I don't like. Therefore, I settle for 34 front and 32 back and started back to use Eco mode. I don't carry heavy loads and many pax in my car. I restricted it to 4 adult pax including myself as a driver, with or without loads at the boot.”
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
“plumped for four tyres at once and will put a calendar appt in to rotate after a year from now on I think. With Kwikfit's summer deal offer I got the four fitted for £519 (under £130 each)”
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes CF1 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | — | 66 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo Proxes CF1
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 62 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 80 vs 70 on dry.
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 78 vs 73 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Proxes CF1 or Ventus Prime 4?
Which is better in the wet, Proxes CF1 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 78 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes CF1 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 80 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Proxes CF1 or Ventus Prime 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Proxes CF1 or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology