Toyo Tranpath looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes CF1 vs Toyo Tranpath — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 46 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes CF1 leads, 69–67 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes CF1
Tire AToyo

Proxes CF1

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews

Toyo Tranpath
Tire BToyo

Tranpath

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Proxes CF1 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1Tranpath
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7067

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    Tranpath: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Proxes CF1 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1Tranpath
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7269

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    Tranpath: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 69

    Comfort

    Tranpath +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1Tranpath
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6971

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    Tranpath: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes CF1 or Tranpath. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 62

    Treadwear

    Tranpath +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1Tranpath
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6063

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62

    Tranpath: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 69

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes CF1 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF1Tranpath
    Reviews found online6966
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes CF1 vs Toyo Tranpath: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes CF1Toyo Tranpath
Relative Score 69 67
Dry 69 67
Wet 72 69
Comfort 69 70
Treadwear 62 64
Handling (owners) 69 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Proxes CF1

Tranpath

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes CF1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
  • Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
All owner themes in the Proxes CF1 review

Tire B Tranpath

Pros

  • Reliable dry weather traction
  • Consistent grip in cold temperatures
  • Solid performance on SUV platforms

Cons

  • Disappointing tread life relative to price
  • Mediocre wet weather performance
  • Poor traction in mud or off-road conditions
All owner themes in the Tranpath review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes CF1 B · Toyo Tranpath
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes CF1

Toyo Tranpath

Narrow edge: Toyo Proxes CF1 — better wet. Where the Toyo Tranpath is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Toyo Tranpath rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 72 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes CF1
Tire B · Toyo Tranpath

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes CF1 or Tranpath?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes CF1 or Tranpath?

Toyo Proxes CF1, 72 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes CF1 or Tranpath?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes CF1 or Tranpath?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Proxes CF1 or Tranpath?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology