Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Toyo Proxes CF1 vs Yokohama Advan dB V552 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 46 + 37 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes CF1 is ahead, 69–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 37 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Proxes CF1 +861Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 70 57 Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
Advan dB V552: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 56.5 = 61
No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
Proxes CF1 +864Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 72 61 Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
Advan dB V552: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 64
No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Comfort
Proxes CF1 +168Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 69 67 Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
Advan dB V552: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Proxes CF1 or Advan dB V552. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
Proxes CF1 +260Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Advan dB V552 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 60 56 Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62
Advan dB V552: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Proxes CF1 +960Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Advan dB V552 Reviews found online 69 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes CF1 | Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 62 |
| Dry | 69 | 61 |
| Wet | 72 | 64 |
| Comfort | 69 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Proxes CF1
62
/ 100
Advan dB V552
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Proxes CF1
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
- Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
Tire B Advan dB V552
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and silent operation at various speeds
- High level of ride comfort, effectively absorbing bumps and potholes
- Good grip and sure-footed performance in wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can cause a floating sensation or lack of sharpness at higher speeds
- Reduced dry cornering grip when pushed hard, with some tendency to wash out
- Mixed feedback on overall durability, with a few users experiencing faster-than-expected wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes CF1 | B · Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 45 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Toyo Proxes CF1
62
/ 100
Yokohama Advan dB V552
Winner: Toyo Proxes CF1 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 61 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 72 vs 64 on wet.
Tire A · Toyo Proxes CF1
Tire B · Yokohama Advan dB V552
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Proxes CF1 or Advan dB V552?
Which is better in the wet, Proxes CF1 or Advan dB V552?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 72 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes CF1 or Advan dB V552?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Proxes CF1 or Advan dB V552?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Proxes CF1 or Advan dB V552?
Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 60 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology