Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews
Toyo Proxes CF1 vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 46 + 15 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes CF1 is ahead, 69–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 64 · 15 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Proxes CF1 +1851Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 42 Reviews found online 70 64 Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 42.3 + 40% × 64.4 = 51
No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
Proxes CF1 +1161Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 57 Reviews found online 72 68 Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57 + 40% × 67.6 = 61
No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison58Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online – 50 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 58
No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
Proxes CF1 +465Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 69 68 Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 67.9 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 73 Reviews found online – 67 Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 67.3 = 70
-
62
Treadwear
Advan Sport AS +1173Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Advan Sport AS Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 60 64 Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62
Advan Sport AS: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 63.7 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Proxes CF1 +366Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Advan Sport AS Reviews found online 69 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes CF1 | Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 61 |
| Dry | 69 | 51 |
| Wet | 72 | 61 |
| Snow | – | 58 |
| Comfort | 69 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Proxes CF1
Advan Sport AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Proxes CF1
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
- Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
Tire B Advan Sport AS
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
- Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
- Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
- Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
- Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes CF1 | B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo Proxes CF1
Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Winner: Toyo Proxes CF1 — better dry, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama Advan Sport AS if treadwear matters most to you.
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 51 on dry.
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 72 vs 61 on wet.
Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 73 vs 62 on treadwear.
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Proxes CF1 or Advan Sport AS?
Which is better in the wet, Proxes CF1 or Advan Sport AS?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 72 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes CF1 or Advan Sport AS?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 51 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Proxes CF1 or Advan Sport AS?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Proxes CF1 or Advan Sport AS?
Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 73 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology