Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Toyo Proxes CF1 vs Yokohama Bluearth E51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 46 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes CF1 is ahead, 69–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Proxes CF1 +1455Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Bluearth E51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 70 48 Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
Bluearth E51: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 55
No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Bluearth E51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
Proxes CF1 +1557Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Bluearth E51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 72 53 Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
Bluearth E51: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 57
No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Bluearth E51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Comfort
Proxes CF1 +1653Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Bluearth E51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 69 38 Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
Bluearth E51: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 37.8 = 53
No road tests of comfort for Proxes CF1 or Bluearth E51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
Bluearth E51 +264Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Bluearth E51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 60 63 Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62
Bluearth E51: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Bluearth E51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Proxes CF1 +2445Why this score
Source Proxes CF1 Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 69 45
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes CF1 | Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 56 |
| Dry | 69 | 55 |
| Wet | 72 | 57 |
| Comfort | 69 | 53 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 45 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Proxes CF1
56
/ 100
Bluearth E51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Proxes CF1
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
- Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
Tire B Bluearth E51
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Stable handling in dry conditions
- Adequate performance for standard commuting
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
- Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes CF1 | B · Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Toyo Proxes CF1
56
/ 100
Yokohama Bluearth E51
Winner: Toyo Proxes CF1 — better handling, comfort and wet. Where the Yokohama Bluearth E51 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Yokohama Bluearth E51 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 45 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 53 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 72 vs 57 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 55 on dry.
Tire A · Toyo Proxes CF1
Tire B · Yokohama Bluearth E51
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Proxes CF1 or Bluearth E51?
Which is better in the wet, Proxes CF1 or Bluearth E51?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 72 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes CF1 or Bluearth E51?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Proxes CF1 or Bluearth E51?
Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Proxes CF1 or Bluearth E51?
Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology