Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes R888 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 0 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes R888
Tire AToyo

Proxes R888

Summer tire

Tests – · none yet Owners – · none yet

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire BKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

± 8

Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online–77

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 75 (est.)
    Reviews found online–79

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 76

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online–70

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online–71

    Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–80

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–58
    Reviews found online–76

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.4 = 65

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProxes R888Crugen HT51
    Reviews found online–74
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes R888 vs Kumho Crugen HT51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes R888Kumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score – 72
Dry – 74
Wet – 76
Snow – 70
Comfort – 70
Noise – 72
Treadwear – 65
Handling (owners) – 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Proxes R888

± 8

Crugen HT51

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes R888

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes R888 B · Kumho Crugen HT51
CategorySummer tireAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available—44
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″
Tread depth—12.5/32″
UTQG—720 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes R888

Kumho Crugen HT51

Only Kumho Crugen HT51 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes R888
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology