Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 20 + 0 road tests and 1,277 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
Ranger H/TT is ahead, 73–60
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 58 · 20 tests Owners 53 · 1,277 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Had the older version on an SRT8. Grip & performance were great. But wear was not. 10K miles(2 rotations) is all I got.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 7 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Proxes Sport | Ranger H/TT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests | 61 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 75 |
Proxes Sport: 60% × 60.6 + 40% × 63.7 = 62
Ranger H/TT: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 72
No road tests of dry for Ranger H/TT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Proxes Sport | Ranger H/TT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 74 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 77 |
Proxes Sport: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 59 = 69
Ranger H/TT: 60% × 74.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for Ranger H/TT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Proxes Sport | Ranger H/TT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 51 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 10 | – |
Proxes Sport: 60% × 51.4 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 35
No road tests of snow for Proxes Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Proxes Sport | Ranger H/TT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests | 49 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 71 |
Proxes Sport: 40% × 49.3 + 60% × 58.7 = 55
Ranger H/TT: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 70.7 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Ranger H/TT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Proxes Sport | Ranger H/TT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / – tests | 72 | – |
| Reviews found online | 68 | – |
Proxes Sport: 60% × 72 + 40% × 68.1 = 70
| Source | Proxes Sport | Ranger H/TT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests | 37 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 54 | 73 |
Proxes Sport: 60% × 37.1 + 40% × 54.3 = 44
Ranger H/TT: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Ranger H/TT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Proxes Sport | Ranger H/TT |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 55 | 74 |
| Source | Proxes Sport | Ranger H/TT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / – tests | 41 | – |
| Category | Toyo Proxes Sport | Avon Ranger H/TT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 73 |
| Dry | 62 | 72 |
| Wet | 69 | 75 |
| Snow | 35 | – |
| Comfort | 55 | 70 |
| Noise | 70 | – |
| Treadwear | 44 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 74 |
| Efficiency | 41 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Proxes Sport
Ranger H/TT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the Toyo Proxes Sport family is generally positive, with users praising its value for money, comfortable ride quality, and capable daily street performance. While drivers note it lacks the sharp turn-in and grip of dedicated 200tw track tires, it is frequently highlighted as a cost-effective alternative to Michelin and Continental. Many prospective buyers note a relative scarcity of reviews, but those who run them report good traction, low noise, and appealing wide fitment options.
“Quote: Originally Posted by Brian Goodwin I own both the Falken and Toyo Proxes Sport, both in 235/40-17. The Toyo rides better, the Falken goes faster through the turns, and turn-in response is much quicker. I have not bothered to take the Toyo to the track because around our fun canyon roads it is clearly slower and with less grip than the Falken. The Falken feels like a race tire, complete with stiff sidewall support for crisp turn-in, used those for track and autocross over the last few months, including two wins in class at autocross. The Toyo feels like a street tire, much like the Continental ECS, complete with much lower weight because sidewalls are comparatively soft and squishy next to the Falken. If you want a soft daily driver 235/40 and you accept it is a few clicks slower than the Falken, the Toyo is great as a daily driver. But if you expect that Toyo to keep up with the Falken on track days, you will be disappointed. Great feedback, thanks Brian. Wish there were more options in this size! May just stick with the RT660s, especially now with the HKS GT2 on the car”
“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money. Read more”
“I have real world experience with the Toyo Proxes Sport AS+. This may be the best all around tire on the planet IMO. I'm old and so I've tried multiple tires in real world conditions as a daily driver with performance in mind. I know every Michelin and Pirelli. I've become an expert on available tires in the USA.. What you will find with This tire: * They are immediately quiet *Resist hydroplaning in big water * Higher than expected dry performance in super hot weather for an AS * Maintain tread pattern to the death and remain quiet. These tires are next level.”
Based on 32 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes Sport | B · Avon Ranger H/TT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 83 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 240 AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 25,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Toyo Proxes Sport
Avon Ranger H/TT
Winner: Avon Ranger H/TT — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Avon Ranger H/TT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Avon Ranger H/TT scores 70 vs 44 on treadwear.
Avon Ranger H/TT scores 74 vs 55 on handling.
Avon Ranger H/TT scores 70 vs 55 on comfort.
Avon Ranger H/TT scores 72 vs 62 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Avon Ranger H/TT, 75 vs 69 on our wet score.
Avon Ranger H/TT, 72 vs 62 on our dry score.
Avon Ranger H/TT, 70 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Avon Ranger H/TT, 70 vs 44 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
