Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes Sport vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 20 + 3 road tests and 1,277 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

N Fera SU1 is ahead, 63–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes Sport
Tire AToyo

Proxes Sport

Summer

± 6

Tests 58 · 20 tests Owners 53 · 1,277 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Had the older version on an SRT8. Grip & performance were great. But wear was not. 10K miles(2 rotations) is all I got.”

Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire BNexen

N Fera SU1

Summer

± 7

Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 62 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Proxes Sport +3
    59
    Why this score
    SourceProxes SportN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 2 tests6155
    Reviews found online6464

    Proxes Sport: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 64.1 = 62

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 55 + 40% × 64.2 = 59

  2. 70

    Wet

    Proxes Sport +6
    64
    Why this score
    SourceProxes SportN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 2 tests7762
    Reviews found online5967

    Proxes Sport: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 59.4 = 70

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 61.9 + 40% × 67.3 = 64

  3. 33

    Snow

    N Fera SU1 +25
    58
    Why this score
    SourceProxes SportN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 48 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online1050

    Proxes Sport: 60% × 48 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 33

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Proxes Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 56

    Comfort

    N Fera SU1 +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceProxes SportN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 2 tests5066
    Reviews found online5966

    Proxes Sport: 40% × 50.1 + 60% × 59.4 = 56

    N Fera SU1: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 65.5 = 66

  5. 71

    Noise

    Proxes Sport +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceProxes SportN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 1 tests7269
    Reviews found online6970

    Proxes Sport: 60% × 72.1 + 40% × 68.6 = 71

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 69.7 = 69

  6. 43

    Treadwear

    N Fera SU1 +23
    66
    Why this score
    SourceProxes SportN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests3670
    Reviews found online5459
    Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–146%62%

    Proxes Sport: 60% × 35.5 + 40% × 54.2 = 43

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 59.2 = 66

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    N Fera SU1 +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceProxes SportN Fera SU1
    Reviews found online5666
  8. 41

    Efficiency

    N Fera SU1 +35
    76
    Why this score
    SourceProxes SportN Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests4176
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes Sport vs Nexen N Fera SU1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes SportNexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score 56 63
Dry 62 59
Wet 70 64
Snow 33 58
Comfort 56 66
Noise 71 69
Treadwear 43 66
Handling (owners) 56 66
Efficiency 41 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Proxes Sport

± 7

N Fera SU1

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Toyo Proxes Sport finished ahead 1 times and Nexen N Fera SU1 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryProxes SportN Fera SU1ΔHead-to-head
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Treadwear 46% 62% −15.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #15/22 #14/22 – 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes Sport

Pros

  • Significantly more affordable than premium tier summer tires while offering around 80-90% of the performance
  • Commendable grip and handling in dry conditions with a progressive, predictable breakaway
  • Low road noise and generally high ride comfort compared to factory run-flats or older performance tires

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, with multiple users reporting replacement necessary between 6,000 and 12,000 miles
  • Inconsistent or slippery wet-weather traction and occasional tendency to hydroplane in heavy standing water
  • Stiff sidewalls on certain sizes leading to a harsher ride quality or increased noise for some drivers
All owner themes in the Proxes Sport review

Tire B N Fera SU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
  • Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
  • Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
  • Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
All owner themes in the N Fera SU1 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Toyo Proxes Sport

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Toyo Proxes Sport family is generally positive, with drivers praising its ride comfort, good value for money, and competent daily street grip. Many owners appreciate unique size options like 345/25-20 for high-performance cars, though enthusiasts note that dedicated track tires offer superior turn-in sharpness and ultimate traction. A common topic of discussion is the scarcity of extensive real-world reviews, particularly regarding newer variants.

forum.miata.net

“Quote: Originally Posted by Brian Goodwin I own both the Falken and Toyo Proxes Sport, both in 235/40-17. The Toyo rides better, the Falken goes faster through the turns, and turn-in response is much quicker. I have not bothered to take the Toyo to the track because around our fun canyon roads it is clearly slower and with less grip than the Falken. The Falken feels like a race tire, complete with stiff sidewall support for crisp turn-in, used those for track and autocross over the last few months, including two wins in class at autocross. The Toyo feels like a street tire, much like the Continental ECS, complete with much lower weight because sidewalls are comparatively soft and squishy next to the Falken. If you want a soft daily driver 235/40 and you accept it is a few clicks slower than the Falken, the Toyo is great as a daily driver. But if you expect that Toyo to keep up with the Falken on track days, you will be disappointed. Great feedback, thanks Brian. Wish there were more options in this size! May just stick with the RT660s, especially now with the HKS GT2 on the car”

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2026-08-09

“I have real world experience with the Toyo Proxes Sport AS+. This may be the best all around tire on the planet IMO. I'm old and so I've tried multiple tires in real world conditions as a daily driver with performance in mind. I know every Michelin and Pirelli. I've become an expert on available tires in the USA.. What you will find with This tire: * They are immediately quiet *Resist hydroplaning in big water * Higher than expected dry performance in super hot weather for an AS * Maintain tread pattern to the death and remain quiet. These tires are next level.”

r/TyreReviews ·17 upvotes ·2026-08-27

“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money. Read more”

Top themes
#Value for money#Ride comfort#Street vs track performance#Wide fitment availability#Tread wear and longevity#Limited review availability

Based on 34 community posts

Tire B

Nexen N Fera SU1

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes Sport B · Nexen N Fera SU1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available8397
Rim diameters17″ – 21″15″ – 24″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″9/32″
UTQG240 AA A300 A A
Treadwear warranty25,000 mi25,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common6161

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes Sport

Nexen N Fera SU1

Winner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better efficiency, snow and treadwear. Pick the Toyo Proxes Sport if wet and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 76 vs 41 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 58 vs 33 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 43 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 56 on comfort.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes Sport
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes Sport or N Fera SU1?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes Sport or N Fera SU1?

Toyo Proxes Sport, 70 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes Sport or N Fera SU1?

Toyo Proxes Sport, 62 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Proxes Sport or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 58 vs 33 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Proxes Sport or N Fera SU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes Sport or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Proxes Sport or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 43 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Proxes Sport or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 76 vs 41 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology