Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews
Yokohama C Drive looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Toyo Proxes ST vs Yokohama C Drive — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 45 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Proxes ST 72, C Drive 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
Proxes ST +171Why this score
Source Proxes ST C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 73 Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 71
No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
75
Wet
Proxes ST +174Why this score
Source Proxes ST C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 77 75 Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
C Drive: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74
No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
66
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Proxes ST C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 64 – Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
Level72Why this score
Source Proxes ST C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 74 74 Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72
C Drive: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Proxes ST or C Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
Proxes ST +366Why this score
Source Proxes ST C Drive Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 72 67 Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69
C Drive: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for C Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
C Drive +172Why this score
Source Proxes ST C Drive Reviews found online 71 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes ST | Yokohama C Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 71 |
| Dry | 72 | 71 |
| Wet | 75 | 74 |
| Snow | 66 | – |
| Comfort | 72 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Proxes ST
C Drive
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Proxes ST
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
- Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning
Cons
- Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
- A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
- Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
Tire B C Drive
Pros
- Excellent wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable, progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from premature wear to high mileage
- Some users report increased noise and stiffness as the tire ages
- Mixed feedback on dry grip performance under aggressive driving conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes ST | B · Yokohama C Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo Proxes ST
Yokohama C Drive
Too close to call: Toyo Proxes ST and Yokohama C Drive are within 2 points overall. Toyo Proxes ST is stronger on treadwear. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Proxes ST or C Drive?
Which is better in the wet, Proxes ST or C Drive?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes ST or C Drive?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Proxes ST or C Drive?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Proxes ST or C Drive?
Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology