Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews
Toyo Proxes ST vs Yokohama Geolandar SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes ST leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
Proxes ST +468Why this score
Source Proxes ST Geolandar SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 75 68 Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
Geolandar SUV: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 68
No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
75
Wet
Proxes ST +372Why this score
Source Proxes ST Geolandar SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 77 73 Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
Geolandar SUV: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72
No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
66
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Proxes ST Geolandar SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) – Reviews found online 64 – Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
72
Comfort
Proxes ST +765Why this score
Source Proxes ST Geolandar SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 74 61 Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72
Geolandar SUV: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Proxes ST or Geolandar SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
Proxes ST +465Why this score
Source Proxes ST Geolandar SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 72 65 Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69
Geolandar SUV: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Proxes ST +170Why this score
Source Proxes ST Geolandar SUV Reviews found online 71 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes ST | Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 69 |
| Dry | 72 | 68 |
| Wet | 75 | 72 |
| Snow | 66 | – |
| Comfort | 72 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Proxes ST
Geolandar SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Proxes ST
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
- Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning
Cons
- Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
- A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
- Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
Tire B Geolandar SUV
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High level of ride comfort
- Strong structural integrity against road hazards like potholes
Cons
- Poor grip and traction in wet weather conditions
- Not suitable for high-performance driving
- Lack of confidence-inspiring handling during cornering in rain
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes ST | B · Yokohama Geolandar SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo Proxes ST
Yokohama Geolandar SUV
Narrow edge: Toyo Proxes ST — better comfort, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar SUV rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 68 on dry.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 75 vs 72 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Proxes ST or Geolandar SUV?
Which is better in the wet, Proxes ST or Geolandar SUV?
Toyo Proxes ST, 75 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes ST or Geolandar SUV?
Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Proxes ST or Geolandar SUV?
Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Proxes ST or Geolandar SUV?
Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology