Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes ST vs Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes ST leads, 71–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes ST
Tire AToyo

Proxes ST

All Season

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceProxes STGeolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7575

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Proxes ST +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProxes STGeolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7776

    Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 73.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 74

    No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 66

    Snow

    Proxes ST +17
    49
    Why this score
    SourceProxes STGeolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online6435

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 35 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Proxes ST +1
    71
    Why this score
    SourceProxes STGeolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7472

    Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes ST or Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceProxes STGeolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–72

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Proxes ST +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceProxes STGeolandar X-CV G057
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7265

    Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Geolandar X-CV G057 +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourceProxes STGeolandar X-CV G057
    Reviews found online7174
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes ST vs Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes STYokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
Relative Score 71 68
Dry 72 73
Wet 75 74
Snow 66 49
Comfort 72 71
Noise – 69
Treadwear 69 65
Handling (owners) 71 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Proxes ST

Geolandar X-CV G057

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-term durability
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality compared to other brands and run-flats
  • Strong dry and wet grip with good resistance to aquaplaning

Cons

  • Poor performance and limited traction in snow and ice
  • A small number of users experienced disappointing treadwear and longevity
  • Conflicting feedback regarding wet grip, with isolated reports of poor performance
All owner themes in the Proxes ST review

Tire B Geolandar X-CV G057

Pros

  • Exceptional wet grip and road confidence in rainy conditions
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Crisp handling and responsive steering performance

Cons

  • Some users report faster-than-expected tread wear
  • Firm ride quality noted on certain crossover fitments
All owner themes in the Geolandar X-CV G057 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes ST B · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available164
Rim diameters19″17″ – 22″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—520 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes ST

Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057

Narrow edge: Toyo Proxes ST — better snow and treadwear. Where the Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Toyo Proxes ST scores 66 vs 49 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes ST scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes ST
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes ST or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes ST or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes ST or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Proxes ST or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 49 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes ST or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Proxes ST or Geolandar X-CV G057?

Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology