Tests – · none yet Owners 31 · 11 reviews
Toyo Proxes TQ looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Toyo Proxes TQ vs Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 56 owner reviews. How we score
Dueler H/L Alenza is ahead, 68–45
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 56 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
Dueler H/L Alenza +768Why this score
Source Proxes TQ Dueler H/L Alenza Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 69 Proxes TQ: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
No road tests of dry for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
34
Wet
Dueler H/L Alenza +3771Why this score
Source Proxes TQ Dueler H/L Alenza Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 43 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 22 72 Proxes TQ: 60% × 42.7 (est.) + 40% × 21.5 = 34
Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 71
No road tests of wet for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
34
Snow
Dueler H/L Alenza +3266Why this score
Source Proxes TQ Dueler H/L Alenza Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 50 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 10 63 Proxes TQ: 60% × 50.1 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 34
Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66
No road tests of snow for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
58
Comfort
Dueler H/L Alenza +1169Why this score
Source Proxes TQ Dueler H/L Alenza Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 47 69 Proxes TQ: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.1 = 58
Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
Dueler H/L Alenza +569Why this score
Source Proxes TQ Dueler H/L Alenza Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 58 72 Proxes TQ: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64
Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 69
No road tests of noise for Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
33
Treadwear
Dueler H/L Alenza +3366Why this score
Source Proxes TQ Dueler H/L Alenza Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 48 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 10 66 Proxes TQ: 60% × 48.5 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 33
Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
48
Handling (owners)
Dueler H/L Alenza +2068Why this score
Source Proxes TQ Dueler H/L Alenza Reviews found online 48 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Proxes TQ | Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 45 | 68 |
| Dry | 61 | 68 |
| Wet | 34 | 71 |
| Snow | 34 | 66 |
| Comfort | 58 | 69 |
| Noise | 64 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 33 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 48 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Proxes TQ
Dueler H/L Alenza
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Proxes TQ
Pros
- Exceptional straight-line traction and launch capability for high-horsepower applications
- Competitive pricing compared to other drag radial alternatives
- Surprisingly quiet operation during normal street driving
Cons
- Dangerous handling characteristics in heavy rain or standing water
- Noticeable sidewall flex during aggressive cornering or rapid steering inputs
- Requires proper heat cycling/warming to achieve maximum performance
Tire B Dueler H/L Alenza
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes TQ | B · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Trackday and Competition tires | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 4 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 18″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 6 - 7/32″ | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | B B | 700 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo Proxes TQ
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza
Winner: Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza — better wet, treadwear and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes TQ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 71 vs 34 on wet.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 66 vs 33 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 66 vs 34 on snow.
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 68 vs 48 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?
Which is better in the wet, Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 71 vs 34 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 68 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 66 vs 34 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 69 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 69 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?
Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 66 vs 33 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology