Toyo Proxes TQ looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes TQ vs Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 56 owner reviews. How we score

Dueler H/L Alenza is ahead, 68–45

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes TQ
Tire AToyo

Proxes TQ

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 31 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    Dueler H/L Alenza +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQDueler H/L Alenza
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5869

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 34

    Wet

    Dueler H/L Alenza +37
    71
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQDueler H/L Alenza
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 43 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online2272

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 42.7 (est.) + 40% × 21.5 = 34

    Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 71

    No road tests of wet for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 34

    Snow

    Dueler H/L Alenza +32
    66
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQDueler H/L Alenza
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 50 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online1063

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 50.1 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 34

    Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 58

    Comfort

    Dueler H/L Alenza +11
    69
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQDueler H/L Alenza
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4769

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.1 = 58

    Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    Dueler H/L Alenza +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQDueler H/L Alenza
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5872

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64

    Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 33

    Treadwear

    Dueler H/L Alenza +33
    66
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQDueler H/L Alenza
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 48 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online1066

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 48.5 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 33

    Dueler H/L Alenza: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dueler H/L Alenza. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 48

    Handling (owners)

    Dueler H/L Alenza +20
    68
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQDueler H/L Alenza
    Reviews found online4868
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes TQ vs Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes TQBridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza
Relative Score 45 68
Dry 61 68
Wet 34 71
Snow 34 66
Comfort 58 69
Noise 64 69
Treadwear 33 66
Handling (owners) 48 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Proxes TQ

Dueler H/L Alenza

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes TQ

Pros

  • Exceptional straight-line traction and launch capability for high-horsepower applications
  • Competitive pricing compared to other drag radial alternatives
  • Surprisingly quiet operation during normal street driving

Cons

  • Dangerous handling characteristics in heavy rain or standing water
  • Noticeable sidewall flex during aggressive cornering or rapid steering inputs
  • Requires proper heat cycling/warming to achieve maximum performance
All owner themes in the Proxes TQ review

Tire B Dueler H/L Alenza

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes TQ B · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza
CategorySummer Trackday and Competition tiresAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available44
Rim diameters16″ – 18″18″ – 22″
Tread depth6 - 7/32″12/32″
UTQGB B700 A B
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallOutlined White Lettering
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes TQ

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza

Winner: Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza — better wet, treadwear and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes TQ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 71 vs 34 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 66 vs 33 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 66 vs 34 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza scores 68 vs 48 on handling.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes TQ
Tire B · Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 71 vs 34 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 68 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 66 vs 34 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 69 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 69 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Proxes TQ or Dueler H/L Alenza?

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza, 66 vs 33 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology