Toyo Proxes TQ looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes TQ vs Toyo R888 R — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 11 + 30 owner reviews. How we score

R888 R is ahead, 63–43

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes TQ
Tire AToyo

Proxes TQ

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 28 · 11 reviews

Toyo R888 R
Tire BToyo

R888 R

Summer

± 7

Tests 64 · 2 tests Owners 60 · 30 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    R888 R +18
    75
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQR888 R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 61 (est.)76
    Reviews found online5272

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 57

    R888 R: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 72.3 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 32

    Wet

    R888 R +23
    55
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQR888 R
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 41 (est.)52
    Reviews found online1860

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 41.5 (est.) + 40% × 17.8 = 32

    R888 R: 60% × 52.3 + 40% × 59.9 = 55

    No road tests of wet for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 33

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQR888 R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 48 (est.)–
    Reviews found online10–

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 48 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 33

    No road tests of snow for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    R888 R +4
    58
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQR888 R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4653

    Proxes TQ: 40% × 64.9 (est.) + 60% × 46.1 = 54

    R888 R: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 53.3 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes TQ or R888 R. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQR888 R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online52–

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.4 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Proxes TQ. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 32

    Treadwear

    R888 R +22
    54
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQR888 R
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 47 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online1047

    Proxes TQ: 60% × 46.6 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 32

    R888 R: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.6 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TQ. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for R888 R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 44

    Handling (owners)

    R888 R +27
    71
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TQR888 R
    Reviews found online4471
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes TQ vs Toyo R888 R: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes TQToyo R888 R
Relative Score 43 63
Dry 57 75
Wet 32 55
Snow 33 –
Comfort 54 58
Noise 61 –
Treadwear 32 54
Handling (owners) 44 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Proxes TQ

± 7

R888 R

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes TQ

Pros

  • Exceptional straight-line traction and launch capability for high-horsepower applications
  • Competitive pricing compared to other drag radial alternatives
  • Surprisingly quiet operation during normal street driving

Cons

  • Dangerous handling characteristics in heavy rain or standing water
  • Noticeable sidewall flex during aggressive cornering or rapid steering inputs
  • Requires proper heat cycling/warming to achieve maximum performance
All owner themes in the Proxes TQ review

Tire B R888 R

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
  • Sharp, communicative steering feedback
  • Strong, stiff sidewall construction

Cons

  • High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Poor performance and potential for aquaplaning in standing water
All owner themes in the R888 R review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes TQ B · Toyo R888 R
CategorySummer Trackday and Competition tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available445
Rim diameters16″ – 18″13″ – 20″
Tread depth6 - 7/32″—
UTQGB B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes TQ

Toyo R888 R

Winner: Toyo R888 R — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes TQ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo R888 R scores 71 vs 44 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo R888 R scores 55 vs 32 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo R888 R scores 54 vs 32 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo R888 R scores 75 vs 57 on dry.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes TQ
Tire B · Toyo R888 R

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes TQ or R888 R?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes TQ or R888 R?

Toyo R888 R, 55 vs 32 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes TQ or R888 R?

Toyo R888 R, 75 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes TQ or R888 R?

Toyo R888 R, 58 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Proxes TQ or R888 R?

Toyo R888 R, 54 vs 32 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology