Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 57 · 38 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (dry braking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Toyo R888 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 38 + 2,195 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 70–63
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,195 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
R888 +374Why this score
Source R888 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests 80 78 Reviews found online 71 68 R888: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 71.4 = 77
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74
-
54
Wet
ADVAN Fleva V701 +1367Why this score
Source R888 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests 51 70 Reviews found online 57 64 R888: 60% × 51.3 + 40% × 57.1 = 54
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67
-
–
Snow
No comparison36Why this score
Source R888 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online – 12 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.3 = 36
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
53
Comfort
ADVAN Fleva V701 +962Why this score
Source R888 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 45 61 R888: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.4 = 53
ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62
No road tests of comfort for R888. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Noise
R888 +169Why this score
Source R888 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 72 75 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) 60 R888: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 59.7 = 69
No owner ratings of noise for R888. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
53
Treadwear
ADVAN Fleva V701 +1669Why this score
Source R888 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 44 59 R888: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 44 = 53
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for R888. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
65
Handling (owners)
ADVAN Fleva V701 +772Why this score
Source R888 ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 65 72 -
67
Efficiency
ADVAN Fleva V701 +471Why this score
Source R888 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 67 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo R888 | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 70 |
| Dry | 77 | 74 |
| Wet | 54 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 53 | 62 |
| Noise | 70 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 67 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
63
/ 100
R888
70
/ 100
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | R888 | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #3/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 79% #8/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 77% #6/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 86% #8/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #1/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 93% #6/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 67% #3/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | 71% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/9 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test | #6/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A R888
Pros
- Phenomenal dry weather grip and cornering stability
- Rapid warm-up time to reach optimal operating temperature
- High value-for-money proposition for track-day enthusiasts
Cons
- Excessive road noise often described as a 'howling' or 'wheel bearing' sound
- Poor performance and safety risks in deep standing water
- Low comfort levels unsuitable for daily driving
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Toyo R888
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.
r/Civic_Type_R
·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
r/mr2
·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo R888 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 70 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 100 AA A | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
63
/ 100
Toyo R888
70
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Toyo R888 if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 67 vs 54 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 62 vs 53 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 72 vs 65 on handling.
Tire A · Toyo R888
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
R888 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Which is better in the wet, R888 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 67 vs 54 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, R888 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Toyo R888, 77 vs 74 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, R888 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, R888 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 62 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, R888 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, R888 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 71 vs 67 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology