Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 16 reviews
Toyo TEO plus looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Toyo TEO plus vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 16 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 72–66
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 63 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +671Why this score
Source TEO plus BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 64 73 TEO plus: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for TEO plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
65
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +1075Why this score
Source TEO plus BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 62 76 TEO plus: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 65
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for TEO plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +674Why this score
Source TEO plus BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 68 76 TEO plus: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 68.3 = 68
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for TEO plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Level67Why this score
Source TEO plus BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 67 TEO plus: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for TEO plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +1377Why this score
Source TEO plus BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 64 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo TEO plus | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 72 |
| Dry | 65 | 71 |
| Wet | 65 | 75 |
| Comfort | 68 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
TEO plus
72
/ 100
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A TEO plus
Pros
- Exceptional cabin quietness and ride comfort
- Impressive tread life and durability, even under heavy loads
- Predictable handling characteristics for daily driving
Cons
- Lack of steering feedback and responsiveness due to soft sidewalls
- Mediocre wet-weather grip and braking performance
- Tendency to understeer when pushed beyond moderate limits
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
- Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
- Strong value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
- Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo TEO plus | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Toyo TEO plus
72
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo TEO plus rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 77 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 65 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 71 vs 65 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 68 on comfort.
Tire A · Toyo TEO plus
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
TEO plus or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, TEO plus or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, TEO plus or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 71 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, TEO plus or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, TEO plus or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology