Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 6 reviews
Toyo Tranpath looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Toyo Tranpath vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 63 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +271Why this score
Source Tranpath BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 70 73 Tranpath: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +475Why this score
Source Tranpath BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 71 76 Tranpath: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 71
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +374Why this score
Source Tranpath BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 71 76 Tranpath: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.4 = 71
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
65
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +267Why this score
Source Tranpath BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 64 67 Tranpath: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
69
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +877Why this score
Source Tranpath BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 69 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo Tranpath | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 72 |
| Dry | 69 | 71 |
| Wet | 71 | 75 |
| Comfort | 71 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tranpath
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Tranpath
Pros
- Reliable dry weather traction
- Consistent grip in cold temperatures
- Solid performance on SUV platforms
Cons
- Disappointing tread life relative to price
- Mediocre wet weather performance
- Poor traction in mud or off-road conditions
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
- Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
- Strong value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
- Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo Tranpath | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo Tranpath
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Tranpath rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 77 vs 69 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 71 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 71 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tranpath or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, Tranpath or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Tranpath or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Tranpath or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 71 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Tranpath or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology