Toyo Tranpath looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Tranpath vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 6 + 63 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Tranpath
Tire AToyo

Tranpath

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +2
    71
    Why this score
    SourceTranpathBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7073

    Tranpath: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourceTranpathBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7176

    Tranpath: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 71

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourceTranpathBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7176

    Tranpath: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.4 = 71

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 65

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceTranpathBluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6467

    Tranpath: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Tranpath. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 69

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +8
    77
    Why this score
    SourceTranpathBluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online6977
Scores at a glance
Toyo Tranpath vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo TranpathYokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 69 72
Dry 69 71
Wet 71 75
Comfort 71 74
Treadwear 65 67
Handling (owners) 69 77

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Tranpath

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Tranpath

Pros

  • Reliable dry weather traction
  • Consistent grip in cold temperatures
  • Solid performance on SUV platforms

Cons

  • Disappointing tread life relative to price
  • Mediocre wet weather performance
  • Poor traction in mud or off-road conditions
All owner themes in the Tranpath review

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
  • Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
  • Strong value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
  • Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
  • Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Tranpath B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—64
Rim diameters—13″ – 18″

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Tranpath

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Tranpath rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 77 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 71 on comfort.

Tire A · Toyo Tranpath
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tranpath or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, Tranpath or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Tranpath or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Tranpath or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 71 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Tranpath or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology