Head-to-head Updated

Uniroyal WinterExpert vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 12 + 16 road tests and 7 + 25 owner reviews. How we score

WinterContact TS 870 is ahead, 82–68

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Uniroyal WinterExpert
Tire AUniroyal

WinterExpert

Winter

± 6

Tests 70 · 12 tests Owners 67 · 7 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)

Continental WinterContact TS 870
± 4

Tests 84 · 16 tests Owners 79 · 25 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (dry handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    WinterContact TS 870 +20
    80
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterContact TS 870
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 14 tests5781
    Reviews found online6679
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–199%100%

    WinterExpert: 60% × 56.6 + 40% × 65.9 = 60

    WinterContact TS 870: 60% × 81 + 40% × 79.2 = 80

  2. 81

    Wet

    WinterContact TS 870 +12
    93
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterContact TS 870
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 16 tests8598
    Reviews found online7587
    Curved Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–187%97%
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%100%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–095%93%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%99%

    WinterExpert: 60% × 85.2 + 40% × 74.7 = 81

    WinterContact TS 870: 60% × 97.9 + 40% × 86.5 = 93

  3. 72

    Snow

    WinterContact TS 870 +6
    78
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterContact TS 870
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 16 tests7882
    Reviews found online6373
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–298%100%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–195%99%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–195%98%

    WinterExpert: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 63.2 = 72

    WinterContact TS 870: 60% × 81.6 + 40% × 73.2 = 78

  4. 59

    Comfort

    WinterContact TS 870 +16
    75
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterContact TS 870
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests5572
    Reviews found online6278

    WinterExpert: 40% × 54.7 + 60% × 61.7 = 59

    WinterContact TS 870: 40% × 71.9 + 60% × 77.5 = 75

  5. 61

    Noise

    WinterContact TS 870 +16
    77
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterContact TS 870
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 12 tests5883
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%99%

    WinterExpert: 60% × 58.1 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 61

    WinterContact TS 870: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 77

    No owner ratings of noise for WinterExpert or WinterContact TS 870. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    WinterContact TS 870 +13
    80
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterContact TS 870
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 7 tests6879
    Reviews found online6580
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–190%95%

    WinterExpert: 60% × 67.9 + 40% × 64.7 = 67

    WinterContact TS 870: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 80.1 = 80

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    WinterContact TS 870 +14
    78
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterContact TS 870
    Reviews found online6478
  8. 83

    Efficiency

    WinterExpert +7
    76
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterContact TS 870
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 14 tests8376
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–095%93%
Scores at a glance
Uniroyal WinterExpert vs Continental WinterContact TS 870: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryUniroyal WinterExpertContinental WinterContact TS 870
Relative Score 68 82
Dry 60 80
Wet 81 93
Snow 72 78
Comfort 59 75
Noise 61 77
Treadwear 67 80
Handling (owners) 64 78
Efficiency 83 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

WinterExpert

± 4

WinterContact TS 870

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Uniroyal WinterExpert finished ahead 1 times and Continental WinterContact TS 870 2 times.

DisciplineCategoryWinterExpertWinterContact TS 870ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 98% 98% −0.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Dry Handling Dry 99% 100% −1.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 87% 97% −10.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% 100% −3.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Braking Wet 95% 93% +1.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16
Wet Handling Wet 98% 99% −1.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Braking Snow 98% 100% −1.4 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Handling Snow 95% 99% −3.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Snow Traction Snow 95% 98% −2.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Noise Noise 98% 99% −1.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Wear Treadwear 90% 95% −4.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 95% 93% +2.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #3/20 #6/20 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Value Cost 89% 69% +19.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 205/55 R16
Overall Ranking Overall #7/55 #8/55 – 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2024 Winter 55 Tyre Braking Test · 205/55 R16

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A WinterExpert

Pros

  • Reliable and great grip on dry, wet, and snow-covered roads
  • Direct and responsive handling with predictable cornering
  • Good fuel economy

Cons

  • Noticeably higher noise levels, particularly on dry roads and during parking maneuvers
  • Limited traction and performance when pushed or driven aggressively
  • Inferior snow and ice performance compared to some competing winter tires like the Hankook Winter I-cept 2
All owner themes in the WinterExpert review

Tire B WinterContact TS 870

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
  • High level of driver confidence and predictability in varied conditions
  • Strong dry road handling and steering feedback

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance on steep, hard-packed snow for some users
  • Potential negative impact on electric vehicle range
  • Occasional reports of understeer on heavy vehicles in cold, greasy conditions
All owner themes in the WinterContact TS 870 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Uniroyal WinterExpert B · Continental WinterContact TS 870
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available9044
Rim diameters13″ – 20″14″ – 19″
Sizes in common2929

Which one should you actually buy?

Uniroyal WinterExpert

Continental WinterContact TS 870

Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870 — better dry, comfort and noise. Pick the Uniroyal WinterExpert if efficiency matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental WinterContact TS 870 scores 80 vs 60 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Continental WinterContact TS 870 scores 75 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Continental WinterContact TS 870 scores 77 vs 61 on noise.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental WinterContact TS 870 scores 78 vs 64 on handling.

Tire A · Uniroyal WinterExpert
Tire B · Continental WinterContact TS 870

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

WinterExpert or WinterContact TS 870?

Which is better in the wet, WinterExpert or WinterContact TS 870?

Continental WinterContact TS 870, 93 vs 81 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, WinterExpert or WinterContact TS 870?

Continental WinterContact TS 870, 80 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, WinterExpert or WinterContact TS 870?

Continental WinterContact TS 870, 78 vs 72 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, WinterExpert or WinterContact TS 870?

Continental WinterContact TS 870, 77 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, WinterExpert or WinterContact TS 870?

Continental WinterContact TS 870, 75 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, WinterExpert or WinterContact TS 870?

Continental WinterContact TS 870, 80 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, WinterExpert or WinterContact TS 870?

Uniroyal WinterExpert, 83 vs 76 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology