Head-to-head Updated

Uniroyal WinterExpert vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 11 + 4 road tests and 7 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

WinterCraft WP52 plus is ahead, 77–68

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Uniroyal WinterExpert
Tire AUniroyal

WinterExpert

Winter

± 6

Tests 70 · 11 tests Owners 67 · 7 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (snow traction)

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus
± 5

Tests 77 · 4 tests Owners 78 · 5 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (wear)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +20
    80
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 3 tests5780
    Reviews found online6680
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–193%96%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%98%

    WinterExpert: 60% × 56.8 + 40% × 66 = 60

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 80.1 = 80

  2. 80

    Wet

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +8
    88
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 4 tests8491
    Reviews found online7584
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%98%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%97%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%98%

    WinterExpert: 60% × 83.8 + 40% × 74.7 = 80

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 90.6 + 40% × 83.7 = 88

  3. 72

    Snow

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +4
    76
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 4 tests7874
    Reviews found online6377
    Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–195%96%
    Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%100%
    Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–192%95%

    WinterExpert: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 62.8 = 72

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 77.2 = 76

  4. 59

    Comfort

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +9
    68
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests5454
    Reviews found online6277
    Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–084%84%

    WinterExpert: 40% × 54.4 + 60% × 62 = 59

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 40% × 54.4 + 60% × 76.9 = 68

  5. 61

    Noise

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 2 tests5858
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%99%

    WinterExpert: 60% × 58.1 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 61

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 58.3 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 62

    No owner ratings of noise for WinterExpert or WinterCraft WP52 plus. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 3 tests6874
    Reviews found online6569
    Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–090%84%

    WinterExpert: 60% × 67.8 + 40% × 64.9 = 67

    WinterCraft WP52 plus: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 69.3 = 72

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    WinterCraft WP52 plus +15
    80
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterCraft WP52 plus
    Reviews found online6580
  8. 83

    Efficiency

    WinterExpert +24
    59
    Why this score
    SourceWinterExpertWinterCraft WP52 plus
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 3 tests8359
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–096%89%
Scores at a glance
Uniroyal WinterExpert vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryUniroyal WinterExpertKumho WinterCraft WP52 plus
Relative Score 68 77
Dry 60 80
Wet 80 88
Snow 72 76
Comfort 59 68
Noise 61 62
Treadwear 67 72
Handling (owners) 65 80
Efficiency 83 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

WinterExpert

± 5

WinterCraft WP52 plus

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Uniroyal WinterExpert finished ahead 0 times and Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryWinterExpertWinterCraft WP52 plusΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% 96% −2.7 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Dry Handling Dry 99% 98% +1.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% 98% −1.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wet Braking Wet 96% 97% −1.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wet Handling Wet 96% 98% −1.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Snow Braking Snow 95% 96% −1.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Snow Handling Snow 98% 100% −2.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Snow Traction Snow 92% 95% −2.9 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 84% 84% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Noise Noise 98% 99% −1.4 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Wear Treadwear 90% 84% +6.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 96% 89% +6.7 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #2/20 #8/20 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Value Cost 76% 76% +0.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #8/20 #4/20 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test · 225/40 R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A WinterExpert

Pros

  • Reliable and great grip on dry, wet, and snow-covered roads
  • Direct and responsive handling with predictable cornering
  • Good fuel economy

Cons

  • Noticeably higher noise levels, particularly on dry roads and during parking maneuvers
  • Limited traction and performance when pushed or driven aggressively
  • Inferior snow and ice performance compared to some competing winter tires like the Hankook Winter I-cept 2
All owner themes in the WinterExpert review

Tire B WinterCraft WP52 plus

Pros

  • Exceptional value and price-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Impressive wet grip, with multiple users highlighting Class A wet rating performance
  • High level of ride comfort and compliance, noticeably better than factory run-flats

Cons

  • Limited long-term durability data available from current reviews
  • High demand or regional availability compared to mainstream domestic brands
All owner themes in the WinterCraft WP52 plus review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Uniroyal WinterExpert B · Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available90—
Rim diameters13″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Uniroyal WinterExpert

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus

Winner: Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus — better dry, handling and comfort. Pick the Uniroyal WinterExpert if efficiency matters most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Uniroyal WinterExpert scores 83 vs 59 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus scores 80 vs 60 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus scores 80 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus scores 68 vs 59 on comfort.

Tire A · Uniroyal WinterExpert
Tire B · Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

WinterExpert or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Which is better in the wet, WinterExpert or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 88 vs 80 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, WinterExpert or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 80 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, WinterExpert or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 76 vs 72 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, WinterExpert or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 62 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, WinterExpert or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 68 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, WinterExpert or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Kumho WinterCraft WP52 plus, 72 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, WinterExpert or WinterCraft WP52 plus?

Uniroyal WinterExpert, 83 vs 59 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology