Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Hi Trac vs Yokohama A.Drive — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

Hi Trac is ahead, 73–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Hi Trac

Hi Trac

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 11 reviews

Yokohama A.Drive
Tire BYokohama

A.Drive

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 28 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Hi Trac +12
    61
    Why this score
    SourceHi TracA.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7758

    Hi Trac: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73

    A.Drive: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Hi Trac +15
    62
    Why this score
    SourceHi TracA.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7959

    Hi Trac: 60% × 75.1 (est.) + 40% × 79.3 = 77

    A.Drive: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62

    No road tests of wet for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Comfort

    Hi Trac +6
    64
    Why this score
    SourceHi TracA.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7058

    Hi Trac: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 70

    A.Drive: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Hi Trac or A.Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 68

    Treadwear

    Hi Trac +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceHi TracA.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7064

    Hi Trac: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 68

    A.Drive: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Hi Trac. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Hi Trac +13
    59
    Why this score
    SourceHi TracA.Drive
    Reviews found online7259
Scores at a glance
Vredestein Hi Trac vs Yokohama A.Drive: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Hi TracYokohama A.Drive
Relative Score 73 62
Dry 73 61
Wet 77 62
Comfort 70 64
Treadwear 68 65
Handling (owners) 72 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Hi Trac

A.Drive

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hi Trac

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and safety
  • High tread longevity and durability
  • Strong value for money

Cons

  • Increased road noise at higher speeds
  • Sensitivity to uneven road surfaces or ruts
  • Limited performance on non-asphalt surfaces
All owner themes in the Hi Trac review

Tire B A.Drive

Pros

  • Competitive price point offering good value for money
  • Reliable and predictable grip in dry road conditions
  • Solid durability and tread life for many users

Cons

  • Significant issues with wet-weather traction and aquaplaning
  • High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
All owner themes in the A.Drive review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Hi Trac B · Yokohama A.Drive
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Hi Trac

Yokohama A.Drive

Winner: Vredestein Hi Trac — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Vredestein Hi Trac rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Hi Trac scores 77 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Hi Trac scores 72 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Hi Trac scores 73 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Hi Trac scores 70 vs 64 on comfort.

Tire A · Vredestein Hi Trac
Tire B · Yokohama A.Drive

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hi Trac or A.Drive?

Which is better in the wet, Hi Trac or A.Drive?

Vredestein Hi Trac, 77 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Hi Trac or A.Drive?

Vredestein Hi Trac, 73 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Hi Trac or A.Drive?

Vredestein Hi Trac, 70 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Hi Trac or A.Drive?

Vredestein Hi Trac, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology